BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38607585)

  • 1. Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    McKechnie T; Shi V; Huang E; Huo B; Doumouras A; Amin N; Eskicioglu C; Hong D
    Surgery; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38876899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association Between Circular Stapler Diameter and Stricture Rates Following Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Allen W; Wells CI; Greenslade M; Bissett IP; O'Grady G
    World J Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(10):3097-3105. PubMed ID: 29633101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
    Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martín-Arévalo J; Pla-Martí V; Huntley D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Izquierdo-Moreno A; Garzón-Hernández LP; Garcés-Albir M; Espí-Macías A; Moro-Valdezate D
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 39(1):51. PubMed ID: 38607585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk Factors and Predictive Biomarkers for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Cancer Surgery with the Double Stapling Technique.
    Isohata N; Endo S; Nemoto T; Nemoto D; Aizawa M; Utano K; Togashi K
    J Anus Rectum Colon; 2023; 7(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 37496564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.