172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38607585)
41. Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.
Pollack E; Johnston S; Petraiuolo WJ; Roy S; Galvain T
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2021; 13():531-540. PubMed ID: 34168470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.
Wong J; Cheung H; Lui R; Fan YW; Smith A; Siu KF
Surgery; 1987 Apr; 101(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 3563886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Castro PM; Ribeiro FP; Rocha Ade F; Mazzurana M; Alvarez GA
Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2014; 27(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 25184776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tejedor P; Sagias F; Flashman K; Kandala NL; Khan J
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 32691353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Keyhole procedure: a new technique for intestinal anastomosis with a large opening and less tissue trauma, using both circular and linear staplers.
Takeyama H; Sato M; Akamo Y; Tanaka M; Hayakawa T; Hasegawa M; Sawai H; Yamamoto M; Ohara E; Manabe T
Surgery; 2003 Mar; 133(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 12660653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Circular stapler size and risk of anastomotic complications in gastroduodenostomy for gastric cancer.
Kim DH; Oh CA; Oh SJ; Choi MG; Noh JH; Sohn TS; Bae JM; Kim S
World J Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(8):1796-9. PubMed ID: 22526036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fallback technique with circular stapler prevents anastomotic obstruction after esophagectomy: A case report of surgical approach.
Zhou P; Wang YL; Liu Q; Li JS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e13571. PubMed ID: 30813121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study.
Miller DL; Roy S; Kassis ES; Yadalam S; Ramisetti S; Johnston SS
Adv Ther; 2018 May; 35(5):707-723. PubMed ID: 29663180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qu H; Liu Y; Bi DS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3608-17. PubMed ID: 25743996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Different characteristics of circular staplers make the difference in anastomotic tensile strength.
Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Franceschilli L; Salvi PF; Gaspari AL; Sileri P
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():295-300. PubMed ID: 26379251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique?
Cavallaro P; Lee GC; Kanters A; Valente M; Holubar SD; Champagne B; Rosen D; Gorgun E; Steele S
Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jan; 26(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 38083875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.
Sozutek A; Colak T; Dag A; Olmez T
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Sep; 67(9):1035-8. PubMed ID: 23018300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity.
Markar SR; Penna M; Venkat-Ramen V; Karthikesalingam A; Hashemi M
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2012; 8(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 21807568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation.
Kimura M; Kuwabara Y; Taniwaki S; Mitsui A; Shibata Y; Ueno S
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29108894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.
Suggs WJ; Kouli W; Lupovici M; Chau WY; Brolin RE
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 17686661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
