These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38608507)

  • 1. Integrated driving risk surrogate model and car-following behavior for freeway risk assessment.
    Wu R; Li L; Shi H; Rui Y; Ngoduy D; Ran B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 201():107571. PubMed ID: 38608507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
    Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model.
    Andersen GJ; Sauer CW
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 17915604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of heterogeneity of car-following behavior on rear-end crash risk.
    Zhang J; Wang Y; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():275-289. PubMed ID: 30802778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
    Zhao P; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term effectiveness of reverse linear perspective markings on crash mitigation in car-following: Evidence from naturalistic observations.
    Ding N; Jiao N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106273. PubMed ID: 34218196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural equations modeling of real-time crash risk variation in car-following incorporating visual perceptual, vehicular, and roadway factors.
    Ding N; Jiao N; Zhu S; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Dec; 133():105298. PubMed ID: 31557617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
    Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Velocity control in car-following behavior with autonomous vehicles using reinforcement learning.
    Wang Z; Huang H; Tang J; Meng X; Hu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106729. PubMed ID: 35700685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An examination of teen drivers' car-following behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: With and without an advanced driving assistance system.
    Bao S; Wu L; Yu B; Sayer JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105762. PubMed ID: 32942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.
    Ali Y; Haque MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107015. PubMed ID: 36889237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Car-Following Behaviors and Driving Styles with Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning.
    Zhou Y; Fu R; Wang C; Zhang R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32899773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.