127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3860993)
21. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Doses in eye lens, thyroid, salivary glands, mammary glands, and gonads, due to radiation scattered in dental orthopantomography.
Campillo-Rivera GE; Vázquez-Bañuelos J; García-Duran Á; Escalona-Llaguno MI; Arteaga MV; Vega-Carrillo HR
Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Apr; 146():57-60. PubMed ID: 30753985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Determination of radiation doses on the teeth exposed during dental and other general purpose X-ray examinations].
Luo WF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Sep; 24(5):306-8. PubMed ID: 2517938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Absorbed doses with intraoral radiography. Function of various technical parameters.
Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 8233434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from radiographic examination of velopharyngeal function during speech.
Isberg A; Julin P; Kraepelien T; Henrikson CO
Cleft Palate J; 1989 Apr; 26(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 2706778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oblique lateral radiographs and bitewings; estimation of organ doses in head and neck region with Monte Carlo calculations.
Aps JK; Scott JM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130419. PubMed ID: 24834483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Sanderink G; De Smet E; Nowak B; Van Dam J; Van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12058262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetry of absorbed radiation in radiographic cephalometry.
Gilda JE; Maillie HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 1518655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Possibilities for dose reduction in coronal spiral CT of the mid-face area].
Cohnen M; Cohnen B; Koch JA; Malms J; Teubert G; Ewen K
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9538928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation exposure to critical structures during transfacial and transcranial TMJ radiography.
Shorten DL; Farman AG; George DI; Sharma S; Wilson D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 3869569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dose reduction in orthodontic lateral cephalography: dosimetric evaluation of a novel cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) and anatomical cranial collimation (ACC).
Hoogeveen RC; Rottke D; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140260. PubMed ID: 25564885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A filter for use in lateral cephalography.
Tanimoto K; Ogawa M; Kodera Y; Tomita S; Wada T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):666-9. PubMed ID: 2812721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Normalized organ doses for various diagnostic radiologic procedures.
Gray JE; Ragozzino MW; Van Lysel MS; Burke TM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 6974456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
