These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38610601)

  • 1. Percutaneous Gastrostomies: Associated Complications in PUSH vs. PULL Techniques over 12 Years in a Referral Centre.
    Piñar-Gutiérrez A; González-Gracia L; Vázquez Gutiérrez R; García-Rey S; Jiménez-Sánchez A; González-Navarro I; Tatay-Domínguez D; Garrancho-Domínguez P; Remón-Ruiz PJ; Martínez-Ortega AJ; Serrano-Aguayo P; Giménez-Andreu MD; García-Fernández FJ; Bozada-García JM; Nacarino-Mejías V; López-Iglesias Á; Pereira-Cunill JL; García-Luna PP
    J Clin Med; 2024 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 38610601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gastrostomies: experience and complications with three modalities in a tertiary centre over a 26-year period.
    Piñar-Gutiérrez A; Serrano-Aguayo P; Gutiérrez RV; Rey SG; González-Navarro I; Tatay-Domínguez D; Garrancho-Domínguez P; Remón-Ruiz PJ; Martínez-Ortega AJ; Mejías VN; Iglesias-López Á; Socas M; Morales-Conde S; García-Fernández FJ; Bozada-García JM; Pereira-Cunill JL; García-Luna PP
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1191204. PubMed ID: 37915325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous Radiology Gastrostomy (PRG)-Associated Complications at a Tertiary Hospital over the Last 25 Years.
    Piñar-Gutiérrez A; Serrano-Aguayo P; García-Rey S; Vázquez-Gutiérrez R; González-Navarro I; Tatay-Domínguez D; Garrancho-Domínguez P; Remón-Ruiz PJ; Martínez-Ortega AJ; Nacarino-Mejías V; Iglesias-López Á; Pereira-Cunill JL; García-Luna PP
    Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 36432521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fluoroscopy-guided Pull-type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Pull-type-PRG) with conventional percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Push-type-PRG): clinical results in 253 patients.
    Yang Y; Schneider J; Düber C; Pitton MB
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Nov; 21(11):2354-61. PubMed ID: 21739349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy. Description and comparison with others gastrostomy types.
    Serrano Aguayo P; Gros Herguido N; Parejo Campos J; Barranco Moreno A; Tous Romero MDC; Pereira Cunill JL; Alarcón Del Agua I; Socas Macias M; García Luna PP; Morales Conde S
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2016 Dec; 16():24-29. PubMed ID: 28531451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: comparison of the push and pull technique.
    Takalo M; Iber T; Autio R; Luoto T
    World J Pediatr Surg; 2024; 7(1):e000687. PubMed ID: 38293648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To push or to pull? A clinical audit on the efficacy and safety of the pull and push percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in oncological patients.
    Kucha P; Zorniak M; Szmit M; Lipczynski R; Wieszczy-Szczepanik P; Kapala A; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Rupinski M; Olesinski T; Maj T; Regula J; Kaminski MF; Januszewicz W
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2023 Dec; 11(10):951-959. PubMed ID: 37948117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic and radiologic gastrostomy tube insertion: a KASID (Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases) study.
    Park SK; Kim JY; Koh SJ; Lee YJ; Jang HJ; Park SJ;
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):750-756. PubMed ID: 30132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Outcomes Between "Pull" Versus "Push" Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Acute Care Surgery: Under-Reported Pull Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Incidence of Tube Dislodgement.
    Kulvatunyou N; Zimmerman SA; Sadoun M; Joseph BA; Friese RS; Gries LM; O'Keeffe T; Tang AL
    J Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 232():56-62. PubMed ID: 30463774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Push' versus 'pull' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.
    Tucker AT; Gourin CG; Ghegan MD; Porubsky ES; Martindale RG; Terris DJ
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Nov; 113(11):1898-902. PubMed ID: 14603043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 231 patients receiving either "pull-through" or "push" percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
    Köhler G; Kalcher V; Koch OO; Luketina RR; Emmanuel K; Spaun G
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jan; 29(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 24993173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Push versus pull gastrostomy in cancer patients: A single center retrospective analysis of complications and technical success rates.
    Currie BM; Getrajdman GI; Covey AM; Alago W; Erinjeri JP; Maybody M; Boas FE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Sep; 99(9):547-553. PubMed ID: 29716845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of clinical outcomes associated with pull-type and introducer-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies.
    Lee SW; Lee JH; Cho H; Ha Y; Lim H; Ahn JY; Choi KS; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Jung HY; Kim JH
    Clin Endosc; 2014 Nov; 47(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 25505719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the use of endoscopic and radiologic gastrostomy in a single head and neck cancer unit.
    Neeff M; Crowder VL; McIvor NP; Chaplin JM; Morton RP
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Aug; 73(8):590-3. PubMed ID: 12887525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: enteral nutrition provision--endoscopic or radiologic gastrostomy?
    Thornton FJ; Fotheringham T; Alexander M; Hardiman O; McGrath FP; Lee MJ
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 12202704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies.
    Cosentini EP; Sautner T; Gnant M; Winkelbauer F; Teleky B; Jakesz R
    Arch Surg; 1998 Oct; 133(10):1076-83. PubMed ID: 9790204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of push and pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placements in 854 patients: A single-center study.
    Bouchiba H; Jacobs MAJM; Bouma G; Ramsoekh D
    JGH Open; 2022 Jan; 6(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 35071789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous endoscopic versus radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: a retrospective analysis on outcomes and complications.
    Strijbos D; Keszthelyi D; Gilissen LPL; Lacko M; Hoeijmakers JGJ; van der Leij C; de Ridder RJJ; de Haan MW; Masclee AAM
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1487-E1495. PubMed ID: 31673622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of push and pull methods and evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Akkersdijk WL; van Bergeijk JD; van Egmond T; Mulder CJ; van Berge Henegouwen GP; van der Werken C; van Erpecum KJ
    Endoscopy; 1995 May; 27(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 7555937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous gastrostomy placement by intervention radiology: Techniques and outcome.
    Karthikumar B; Keshava SN; Moses V; Chiramel GK; Ahmed M; Mammen S
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2018; 28(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 30050247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.