163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38610787)
1. The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning.
Bischofreiter M; Sacan E; Gattringer M; Gruber MS; Breulmann FL; Kindermann H; Heuberer P; Mattiassich G; Ortmaier R
J Clin Med; 2024 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 38610787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software.
Moroder P; Urvoy M; Raiss P; Werthel JD; Akgün D; Chaoui J; Siegert P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):619-631. PubMed ID: 34669618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lilley BM; Lachance A; Peebles AM; Powell SN; Romeo AA; Denard PJ; Provencher CMT
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 May; 31(5):1073-1082. PubMed ID: 35017079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model.
Huish EG; Athwal GS; Neyton L; Walch G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 33044311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and Reliability of Computerized Surgical Planning Software in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Bedeir YH; Tabeayo E; Chou TA; Gruson KI
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37400. PubMed ID: 37182024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lima DJL; Markel J; Yawman JP; Whaley JD; Sabesan VJ
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30949924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted analysis of functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implications for component choice and orientation.
Hochreiter B; Meisterhans M; Zindel C; Calek AK; Gerber C
J Exp Orthop; 2023 Mar; 10(1):23. PubMed ID: 36917396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The addition of preoperative three-dimensional analysis alters implant choice in shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BC; Denard PJ; Tokish JM; Bedi A; Donegan RP; Metcalfe N; Dines JS
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Aug; 14(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 35846399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Accuracy of Three-Dimensional CT Scan Software in Predicting Prosthetic Utilization in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Baumgarten KM; Radtke L
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Jan; 30(2):e223-e232. PubMed ID: 34613949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of humeral head measurements performed using two- and three-dimensional computed tomography in patients with shoulder instability.
Stefaniak J; Kubicka AM; Wawrzyniak A; Romanowski L; Lubiatowski P
Int Orthop; 2020 Oct; 44(10):2049-2056. PubMed ID: 32712787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study.
Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty.
Hao KA; Sutton CD; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Struk AM; Haupt ET; Leonor T; King JJ
JSES Int; 2022 Mar; 6(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 35252914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
