BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38610787)

  • 21. Reliability and accuracy of templating the proximal humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty.
    Buzzell JE; Lutton DM; Shyr Y; Neviaser RJ; Lee DH
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(5):728-33. PubMed ID: 19286400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Scalise JJ; Codsi MJ; Bryan J; Brems JJ; Iannotti JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Nov; 90(11):2438-45. PubMed ID: 18978413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pre-operative arthritic glenoid assessment: 3D automated planning software versus manual multiplanar measurements of version and inclination.
    Hall T; Wong JRY; Dirckx M; Rajesparan K; Rashid A
    J Orthop; 2023 Feb; 36():24-28. PubMed ID: 36582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Software in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Wako Y; Nakamura J; Miura M; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):601-607. PubMed ID: 28927561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty.
    Min KS; Fox HM; Bedi A; Walch G; Warner JJP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Mar; 102-B(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 32114820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Hsu CP; Wu CT; Chen CY; Lin SC; Hsu KY
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4065-4075. PubMed ID: 36445496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patients who have intraoperative deviations in their preoperative plan have inferior clinical and radiographic outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Baumgarten KM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Sep; 32(9):e451-e463. PubMed ID: 36868298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors associated with humeral stem revision in anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revision.
    Kew ME; Mathew JI; Moran J; Fu MC; Taylor SA; Dines JS; Blaine TA; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1867-1875. PubMed ID: 36842465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients.
    Van Haver A; Heylen S; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 26652701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.
    Hardy A; Loriaut P; Granger B; Neffati A; Massein A; Casabianca L; Pascal-Moussellard H; Gerometta A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jan; 26(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 27734111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient-specific instrumentation.
    Hwang S; Werner BC; Provencher M; Horinek JL; Moroder P; Ardebol J; Denard PJ;
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1654-1661. PubMed ID: 37004738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Grubhofer F; Muniz Martinez AR; Haberli J; Selig ME; Ernstbrunner L; Price MD; Warner JJP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jun; 30(6):e309-e316. PubMed ID: 32950671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Miura M; Hagiwara S; Nakamura J; Wako Y; Kawarai Y; Ohtori S
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1572-1578. PubMed ID: 29352686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
    Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.
    Chalmers PN; Romeo AA; Nicholson GP; Boileau P; Keener JD; Gregory JM; Salazar DH; Tashjian RZ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 30601321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High intra- and inter-observer reliability of planning implant size in MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.
    Schoenmakers DAL; Theeuwen DMJ; Schotanus MGM; Jansen EJP; van Haaren EH; Hendrickx RPM; Kort NP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Feb; 29(2):573-578. PubMed ID: 32232539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of Glenosphere and baseplate parameters on Glenoid bone strains in reverse shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Pauzenberger L; Dwyer C; Obopilwe E; Nowak MD; Cote M; Romeo AA; Mazzocca AD; Dyrna F
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):587. PubMed ID: 31805924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?
    Erickson BJ; Chalmers PN; Denard P; Lederman E; Horneff G; Werner BC; Provencher MT; Romeo AA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 32544424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.