These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861102)

  • 21. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Pavlin D; Illes D; Slaj M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 20578864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase.
    Tollaro I; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Tanasescu CD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Oct; 110(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 8876494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a severe unilateral lingual crossbite with combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgery.
    Cureton SL; Bice R; Strider J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 10842117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The frequency and distribution of skeletal and dental components in Class II orthognathic surgery patients.
    Lawrence TN; Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1985 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 3855314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maxillary and mandibular dental-arch dimensions and occlusion in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients form 3 to 17 years of age.
    Heidbuchel KL; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Jan; 34(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9003908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.
    Papagiannis A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 25840587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Credibility of Pont's index in Egyptian population.
    Zahw EK; Albelasy NF; Fouda AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1008. PubMed ID: 39210365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion.
    Buschang PH; Stroud J; Alexander RG
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 8181550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Study on the dental arch width in Class II malocclusion].
    Xu JP; Shen PM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 16400487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 16627179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid maxillary expansion in early-mixed dentition: effectiveness of increasing arch dimension with anchorage on deciduous teeth.
    Mutinelli S; Cozzani M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 26147817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar heights of French-Canadians 10 to 15 years of age.
    Buschang PH; Carrillo R; Liu SS; Demirjian A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae.
    Handelman CS
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):95-109; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 8712499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition.
    Marinelli A; Mariotti M; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21515229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.