These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861103)

  • 1. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions.
    Wieslander L; Lagerström L
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Büyükerkmen A; Sari Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Feb; 25(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic?
    Creekmore TD; Radney LJ
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):89-108. PubMed ID: 6572043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K; Harvold EP
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.
    Hamilton SD; Sinclair PM; Hamilton RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Nov; 92(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 3479011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator.
    Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthopedic effects with "conventional" fixed orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report.
    Edwards JG
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Oct; 84(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 6578680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.