BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861103)

  • 1. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions.
    Wieslander L; Lagerström L
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Büyükerkmen A; Sari Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Feb; 25(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic?
    Creekmore TD; Radney LJ
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):89-108. PubMed ID: 6572043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K; Harvold EP
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.
    Hamilton SD; Sinclair PM; Hamilton RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Nov; 92(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 3479011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator.
    Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthopedic effects with "conventional" fixed orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report.
    Edwards JG
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Oct; 84(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 6578680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.