These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38611631)

  • 41. Automatic coronary artery segmentation and diagnosis of stenosis by deep learning based on computed tomographic coronary angiography.
    Li Y; Wu Y; He J; Jiang W; Wang J; Peng Y; Jia Y; Xiong T; Jia K; Yi Z; Chen M
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6037-6045. PubMed ID: 35394183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prediction of Hidden Coronary Artery Disease Using Machine Learning in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
    Heo J; Yoo J; Lee H; Lee IH; Kim JS; Park E; Kim YD; Nam HS
    Neurology; 2022 Jul; 99(1):e55-e65. PubMed ID: 35470135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Impact of both cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR on the assessment of coronary risk].
    Silber S; Richartz BM
    Z Kardiol; 2005; 94 Suppl 4():IV/70-80. PubMed ID: 16416070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial.
    Hausleiter J; Meyer T; Hadamitzky M; Zankl M; Gerein P; Dörrler K; Kastrati A; Martinoff S; Schömig A
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Dec; 28(24):3034-41. PubMed ID: 17540851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An algorithm for noninvasive identification of angiographic three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients on the basis of cardiac risk and electron-beam computed tomographic calcium scores.
    Schmermund A; Bailey KR; Rumberger JA; Reed JE; Sheedy PF; Schwartz RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 9973025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The feasibility of early detecting coronary artery disease using deep learning-based algorithm based on electrocardiography.
    Tang P; Wang Q; Ouyang H; Yang S; Hua P
    Aging (Albany NY); 2023 May; 15(9):3524-3537. PubMed ID: 37186897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
    Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Role of noninvasive imaging in cardiology].
    Gaemperli O
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Jan; 102(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23384928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Combined Coronary CT-Angiography and TAVI-Planning: A Contrast-Neutral Routine Approach for Ruling-out Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
    Gohmann RF; Lauten P; Seitz P; Krieghoff C; Lücke C; Gottschling S; Mende M; Weiß S; Wilde J; Kiefer P; Noack T; Desch S; Holzhey D; Borger MA; Thiele H; Abdel-Wahab M; Gutberlet M
    J Clin Med; 2020 May; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32471233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Minimal Patient Clinical Variables to Accurately Predict Stress Echocardiography Outcome: Validation Study Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Bennasar M; Banks D; Price BA; Kardos A
    JMIR Cardio; 2020 May; 4(1):e16975. PubMed ID: 32469316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Machine learning-enhanced echocardiography for screening coronary artery disease.
    Guo Y; Xia C; Zhong Y; Wei Y; Zhu H; Ma J; Li G; Meng X; Yang C; Wang X; Wang F
    Biomed Eng Online; 2023 May; 22(1):44. PubMed ID: 37170232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease.
    Juarez-Orozco LE; Saraste A; Capodanno D; Prescott E; Ballo H; Bax JJ; Wijns W; Knuuti J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 20(11):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 30982851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Machine learning insight into the role of imaging and clinical variables for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease and revascularization: An exploratory analysis of the CONSERVE study.
    Baskaran L; Ying X; Xu Z; Al'Aref SJ; Lee BC; Lee SE; Danad I; Park HB; Bathina R; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Cerci R; Choi EY; Choi JH; Choi SY; Cole J; Doh JH; Ha SJ; Her AY; Kepka C; Kim JY; Kim JW; Kim SW; Kim W; Lu Y; Kumar A; Heo R; Lee JH; Sung JM; Valeti U; Andreini D; Pontone G; Han D; Villines TC; Lin F; Chang HJ; Min JK; Shaw LJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233791. PubMed ID: 32584909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The clinical evaluation of the CADence device in the acoustic detection of coronary artery disease.
    Thomas JL; Ridner M; Cole JH; Chambers JW; Bokhari S; Yannopoulos D; Kern M; Wilson RF; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1841-1848. PubMed ID: 29936668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.
    Pontone G; Guaricci AI; Palmer SC; Andreini D; Verdecchia M; Fusini L; Lorenzoni V; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Baggiano A; Rabbat MG; Cademartiri F; Strippoli GF
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 300():276-281. PubMed ID: 31748186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Machine Learning-based Algorithm Enables the Exclusion of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.
    Głowacki J; Krysiński M; Czaja-Ziółkowska M; Wasilewski J
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1416-1421. PubMed ID: 31839566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Machine Learning Model for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease Using Noninvasive Clinical Parameters.
    Sayadi M; Varadarajan V; Sadoughi F; Chopannejad S; Langarizadeh M
    Life (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36431068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Chao SP; Law WY; Kuo CJ; Hung HF; Cheng JJ; Lo HM; Shyu KG
    Eur Heart J; 2010 Aug; 31(15):1916-23. PubMed ID: 20233790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.