These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38611974)
1. Enhancing Fused Deposition Modeling Precision with Serial Communication-Driven Closed-Loop Control and Image Analysis for Fault Diagnosis-Correction. Behseresht S; Love A; Valdez Pastrana OA; Park YH Materials (Basel); 2024 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 38611974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micromechanical Models for FDM 3D-Printed Polymers: A Review. Bol RJM; Šavija B Polymers (Basel); 2023 Nov; 15(23):. PubMed ID: 38231913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric Investigation and Optimization to Study the Effect of Process Parameters on the Dimensional Deviation of Fused Deposition Modeling of 3D Printed Parts. Abas M; Habib T; Noor S; Salah B; Zimon D Polymers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36080740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Processing Parameters on the Quality of Pharmaceutical Solid Dosage Forms Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Alhijjaj M; Nasereddin J; Belton P; Qi S Pharmaceutics; 2019 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31783633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphology and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Wood Fiber/Polylactic Acid Composite Parts Using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): The Effects of Printing Speed. Yang TC; Yeh CH Polymers (Basel); 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterisation of fused deposition modeling 3D printers for pharmaceutical and medical applications. Feuerbach T; Kock S; Thommes M Pharm Dev Technol; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 29938558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fused Deposition Modeling Parameter Optimization for Cost-Effective Metal Part Printing. Tosto C; Tirillò J; Sarasini F; Sergi C; Cicala G Polymers (Basel); 2022 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 36015518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential for Natural Fiber Reinforcement in PLA Polymer Filaments for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Lee CH; Padzil FNBM; Lee SH; Ainun ZMA; Abdullah LC Polymers (Basel); 2021 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 33925266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring Machine Learning-Based Fault Monitoring for Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing: Challenges and Opportunities. Sampedro GAR; Rachmawati SM; Kim DS; Lee JM Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image-based dataset of artifact surfaces fabricated by additive manufacturing with applications in machine learning. Lyu J; Akhavan J; Manoochehri S Data Brief; 2022 Apr; 41():107852. PubMed ID: 35146087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive Manufacturing for Occupational Hygiene: A Comprehensive Review of Processes, Emissions, & Exposures. Stefaniak AB; Du Preez S; Du Plessis JL J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2021 Jun; ():1-50. PubMed ID: 34139957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of low-cost 3D-printed parts made of PLA-aluminum. Sukindar NA; Md Yasir ASH; Azhar MD; Md Azhar MA; Abd Halim NFH; Sulaiman MH; Ahmad Sabli ASH; Mohd Ariffin MKA Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e25508. PubMed ID: 38384568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anomaly Detection in Fused Filament Fabrication Using Machine Learning. Goh GD; Hamzah NMB; Yeong WY 3D Print Addit Manuf; 2023 Jun; 10(3):428-437. PubMed ID: 37346189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface Quality Enhancement of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printed Samples Based on the Selection of Critical Printing Parameters. Pérez M; Medina-Sánchez G; García-Collado A; Gupta M; Carou D Materials (Basel); 2018 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 30096826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM): Fiber Length and Fiber Implementation Techniques. Ismail KI; Yap TC; Ahmed R Polymers (Basel); 2022 Nov; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 36365656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Productivity Comparison Between Vat Polymerization and Fused Filament Fabrication Methods for Additive Manufacturing of Polymers. Muenks D; Kyosev Y 3D Print Addit Manuf; 2023 Feb; 10(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 36998801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Process Parameters on Energy Consumption, Physical, and Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling. Enemuoh EU; Duginski S; Feyen C; Menta VG Polymers (Basel); 2021 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 34372007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of 3D printing parameters in polylactic acid bio-metamaterial under cyclic bending loading considering fracture features. Dadashi A; Azadi M Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26357. PubMed ID: 38404784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral Features Analysis for Print Quality Prediction in Additive Manufacturing: An Acoustics-Based Approach. Olowe M; Ogunsanya M; Best B; Hanif Y; Bajaj S; Vakkalagadda V; Fatoki O; Desai S Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(15):. PubMed ID: 39123912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of testing speed on the tensile and mode I fracture behavior of specimens printed through the Fused Deposition Modeling technique. Zhan J; Cai J; Hasani R Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3960. PubMed ID: 38368494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]