These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38611981)

  • 1. A Methodological Approach for Motor Selection in Dental Impression Material Dispensers Using Experimental and Image Analysis Techniques.
    Hwang JM; Park SW; Jeong JS; Kim JW; Ko DC; Jang JS
    Materials (Basel); 2024 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 38611981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traction Performance Evaluation of the Electric All-Wheel-Drive Tractor.
    Baek SY; Baek SM; Jeon HH; Kim WS; Kim YS; Sim TY; Choi KH; Hong SJ; Kim H; Kim YJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MRAS state estimator for speed sensorless ISFOC induction motor drives with Luenberger load torque estimation.
    Zorgani YA; Koubaa Y; Boussak M
    ISA Trans; 2016 Mar; 61():308-317. PubMed ID: 26775088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Torque resistance of impression copings after direct implant impression: An in vitro evaluation of impression materials with and without adhesive.
    Auroy P; Nicolas E; Bedouin Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 27475917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of fit between implant impression coping and implant replica pairs for three implant systems.
    Nicoll RJ; Sun A; Haney S; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 23328195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speed of the bacterial flagellar motor near zero load depends on the number of stator units.
    Nord AL; Sowa Y; Steel BC; Lo CJ; Berry RM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(44):11603-11608. PubMed ID: 29078322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extrusion-mixing compared with hand-mixing of polyether impression materials?
    McMahon C; Kinsella D; Fleming GJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Dec; 18(4):150-4. PubMed ID: 21265432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
    Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips.
    Maluly-Proni AT; Delben JA; Briso ALF; Marson FC; Dos Santos PH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 33454110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of impression holding time and tray removal speed on the dimensional accuracy of impressions for artificial abutment tooth inclined.
    Hirota Y; Tawada Y; Komatsu S; Watanabe F
    Odontology; 2021 Jan; 109(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 32691180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and optimization of dual-motor electric tractor drive system based on driving cycles.
    Zhang J; Zhao B; Yan X; Liu M; Xu L; Shang C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286378. PubMed ID: 37267273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.
    Jayaraman S; Singh BP; Ramanathan B; Pazhaniappan Pillai M; MacDonald L; Kirubakaran R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 4(4):CD012256. PubMed ID: 29617037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.