199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38613173)
41. Machine Learning to Predict the Response to Lenvatinib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Ma J; Bo Z; Zhao Z; Yang J; Yang Y; Li H; Yang Y; Wang J; Su Q; Wang J; Chen K; Yu Z; Wang Y; Chen G
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36765583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Liu WC; Li MX; Qian WX; Luo ZW; Liao WJ; Liu ZL; Liu JM
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():8723-8736. PubMed ID: 34849027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.
Ye Z; An S; Gao Y; Xie E; Zhao X; Guo Z; Li Y; Shen N; Ren J; Zheng J
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):33. PubMed ID: 36653875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Explainable machine learning model for predicting skeletal muscle loss during surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.
Hsu WH; Ko AT; Weng CS; Chang CL; Jan YT; Lin JB; Chien HJ; Lin WC; Sun FJ; Wu KP; Lee J
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle; 2023 Oct; 14(5):2044-2053. PubMed ID: 37435785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prediction of low cardiac output syndrome in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning.
Hong L; Xu H; Ge C; Tao H; Shen X; Song X; Guan D; Zhang C
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():973147. PubMed ID: 36091676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Using machine learning to identify patients at high risk of developing low bone density or osteoporosis after gastrectomy: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis.
Zhu Y; Liu Y; Wang Q; Niu S; Wang L; Cheng C; Chen X; Liu J; Zhao S
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Dec; 149(19):17479-17493. PubMed ID: 37897658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Machine learning model based on enhanced CT radiomics for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Wang Y; Bai G; Huang M; Chen W
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1308317. PubMed ID: 38549935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Predicting diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer using machine learning.
Zhong X; Lin Y; Zhang W; Bi Q
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18301. PubMed ID: 37880320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The prediction of distant metastasis risk for male breast cancer patients based on an interpretable machine learning model.
Zhao X; Jiang C
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Apr; 23(1):74. PubMed ID: 37085843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Machine Learning Approach Using XGBoost Predicts Lung Metastasis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.
Yuan Y; Wang R; Luo M; Zhang Y; Guo F; Bai G; Yang Y; JingZhao
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():8501819. PubMed ID: 36277898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prediction Model of Ocular Metastases in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Development and Interpretation Study.
Zou J; Shen YK; Wu SN; Wei H; Li QJ; Xu SH; Ling Q; Kang M; Liu ZL; Huang H; Chen X; Wang YX; Liao XL; Tan G; Shao Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338231219352. PubMed ID: 38233736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Interpretability-based machine learning for predicting the risk of death from pulmonary inflammation in Chinese intensive care unit patients.
Zhai Y; Lan D; Lv S; Mo L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1399527. PubMed ID: 38933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of Various Heavy Metal Exposures on Insulin Resistance in Non-diabetic Populations: Interpretability Analysis from Machine Learning Modeling Perspective.
Liu J; Li X; Zhu P
Biol Trace Elem Res; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38409445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interpretable machine learning model based on the systemic inflammation response index and ultrasound features can predict central lymph node metastasis in cN0T1-T2 papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Pang J; Yang M; Li J; Zhong X; Shen X; Chen T; Qian L
Gland Surg; 2023 Nov; 12(11):1485-1499. PubMed ID: 38107491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cancer Metastasis Prediction and Genomic Biomarker Identification through Machine Learning and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Research.
Yagin B; Yagin FH; Colak C; Inceoglu F; Kadry S; Kim J
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 37958210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Artificial intelligence based system for predicting permanent stoma after sphincter saving operations.
Kuo CY; Kuo LJ; Lin YK
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16039. PubMed ID: 37749194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Development and Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict 1-Year Ischemic Stroke and Bleeding Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer.
Truong B; Zheng J; Hornsby L; Fox B; Chou C; Qian J
Cardiovasc Toxicol; 2024 Apr; 24(4):365-374. PubMed ID: 38499940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Predicting the risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics.
Zhuo M; Tang Y; Guo J; Qian Q; Xue E; Chen Z
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2024 Jan; 51(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 37798591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.
Yu M; Yuan Z; Li R; Shi B; Wan D; Dong X
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1337219. PubMed ID: 38380369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Computed tomography-based radiomics machine learning classifiers to differentiate type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancers.
Li J; Li X; Ma J; Wang F; Cui S; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5193-5204. PubMed ID: 36515713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
