These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38613608)

  • 1. Is "Kidney Stone Calculator" efficient in predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration? A holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers comparative analysis.
    Chicaud M; Kutchukian S; Doizi S; Audenet F; Berthe L; Yonneau L; Lebret T; Timsit MO; Mejean A; Candela L; Solano C; Corrales M; Duquesne I; Descazeaud A; Traxer O; Panthier F
    World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):233. PubMed ID: 38613608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Ulvik Ø; Æsøy MS; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 35300888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Uleri A; Farré A; Izquierdo P; Angerri O; Kanashiro A; Balaña J; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Sanchez-Martin F; Monga M; Serrano A; Gupta M; Baboudjian M; Gallioli A; Breda A; Emiliani E
    Eur Urol; 2024 Jun; 85(6):529-540. PubMed ID: 38290963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison Between Holmium:YAG Laser with MOSES Technology vs Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Kidney Stones in Adults: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis From the FLEXible Ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry.
    Castellani D; Fong KY; Lim EJ; Chew BH; Tailly T; Emiliani E; Teoh JY; Chai CA; Heng CT; Ong Lay Keat W; Tanidir Y; Ragoori D; Galosi AB; Singh A; Bin Hamri S; Traxer O; Somani BK; Gauhar V
    J Urol; 2023 Aug; 210(2):323-330. PubMed ID: 37126223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser
    Jiang P; Okhunov Z; Afyouni AS; Ali S; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Bhatt R; Brevik A; Ayad M; Larson K; Osann K; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2023 Mar; 37(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 36401505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis.
    Delbarre B; Baowaidan F; Culty T; Khelfat L; Brassier M; Ferragu M; Magnier A; Secourgeon A; Tariel F; Lebdai S; Bigot P
    Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 May; 51():7-12. PubMed ID: 37187726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy by thulium fiber laser versus holmium laser: A single-center prospective randomized study.
    Chandramohan V; Swamy PMS; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Babu M; Anandan H; Panda R
    Urol Ann; 2023; 15(3):285-288. PubMed ID: 37664089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ablation rates with Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser: Influence of the stone phantom homogeneity. An in vitro study.
    Kutchukian S; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Germain T; Dragos L; Berthe L; Solano C; Candela L; Corrales M; Chicaud M; Traxer O; Panthier F
    Prog Urol; 2023 Aug; 33(8-9):456-462. PubMed ID: 37442755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones' surgical planning: "kidney stone calculator" a pilot study.
    Panthier F; Traxer O; Yonneau L; Lebret T; Berthe L; Illoul L; Timsit MO; Mejean A; Doizi S; Audenet F
    World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3607-3614. PubMed ID: 33779821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management.
    Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Guseynov M; Andronov AS; Plekhanova OA
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 33238763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).
    Taratkin M; Azilgareeva C; Petov V; Morozov A; Ali S; Babaevskaya D; De Coninck V; Korolev D; Akopyan G; Scoffone CM; Chinenov D; Androsov A; Fajkovic H; Lifshitz D; Traxer O; Enikeev D
    World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3705-3711. PubMed ID: 37855897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From laser-on time to lithotripsy duration: how neural networks can refine "KIDNEY STONE CALCULATOR" predictions for ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration: preliminary results.
    Panthier F; Berthe L; Ghnatios C; Smith D; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2024 Feb; 42(1):99. PubMed ID: 38400928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus!
    Sierra A; Corrales M; Piñero A; Kolvatzis M; Somani B; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2313-2321. PubMed ID: 35933626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).
    Keat WOL; Somani BK; Pietropaolo A; Chew BH; Chai CA; Inoue T; Ragoori D; Biligere S; Galosi AB; Pavia MP; Milanese G; Ahn T; More S; Sarica K; Traxer O; Teoh JY; Gauhar V; Castellani D
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):2881-2888. PubMed ID: 36929407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: A prospective, single-center study.
    Gupta A; Ganpule AP; Puri A; Singh AG; Sabnis RB; Desai MR
    Asian J Urol; 2024 Jul; 11(3):460-465. PubMed ID: 39139534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy results in shorter operating times and large cost savings.
    Ryan JR; Nguyen MH; Linscott JA; Nowicki SW; James E; Jumper BM; Ordoñez M; Ingimarsson JP
    World J Urol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):2077-2082. PubMed ID: 35729369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.
    Solano C; Corrales M; Panthier F; Candela L; Doizi S; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2627-2636. PubMed ID: 37468656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Haas CR; Knoedler MA; Li S; Gralnek DR; Best SL; Penniston KL; Nakada SY
    J Urol; 2023 Feb; 209(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 36621994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
    Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser time and energy during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.
    Molina WR; Marchini GS; Pompeo A; Sehrt D; Kim FJ; Monga M
    Urology; 2014 Apr; 83(4):738-44. PubMed ID: 24486000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.