116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38614053)
1. Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management.
Lorenset LC; Percicote AP; Munhos SHO; Zanine RM
Pathol Res Pract; 2024 May; 257():155283. PubMed ID: 38614053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of negative cone specimens of the cervix: A review.
Lorenset LC; Zanine RM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151929. PubMed ID: 35245822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The expression of p16 (INK4a) and Ki-67 in relation to high-risk human papilloma viral load and residual disease after conization with positive margins.
Song SH; Park HM; Eom DW; Lee JK; Lee NW; Kim AR; Hur JY; Lee KW; Park YK; Saw HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(4):858-67. PubMed ID: 17367326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reevaluation of negative cone biopsy results after a positive cervical biopsy finding.
Koc N; Sahin D; Ayas S
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Apr; 17(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 23519286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examination of sources of diagnostic error leading to cervical cone biopsies with no evidence of dysplasia.
Carrigg A; Teschendorf C; Amaro D; Weidner N; Tipps A; Shabaik A; Peterson MR; Lin GY; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 139(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 23525611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual immunostaining of cervical cytology specimens with atypical squamous cells for p16/Ki-67 does not exclude the existence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Koo YJ; Hahn HS; Lee IH; Lim KT; Lee KH; Kim HS; Kim TJ; Chun YK; Kim HS; Hong SR
Virchows Arch; 2013 Nov; 463(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 24081504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recurrent high-grade cervical lesion after primary conization is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection in Norway.
Vintermyr OK; Iversen O; Thoresen S; Quint W; Molijn A; de Souza S; Rosillon D; Holl K
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 24631451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
