These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861496)

  • 1. [The forensic responsibility of the physician].
    Oechsler M
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1985; 30():1-4. PubMed ID: 3861496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Responsibility for documentation in practice and clinical work].
    Günther H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1983 Dec; 38(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 6581969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Responsibility lies with the chief physician. The patient has the right to treatment with specialist standards].
    Fortschr Med; 1987 Jun; 105(21):52. PubMed ID: 3623391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The federal court on the demand to view medical records].
    Laufs A
    Chirurg; 1983 Mar; 54(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 6861571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Elucidation of the patient concerning treatment errors].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Feb; 111(6):234-5. PubMed ID: 3943478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Limits of patient responsibility for cooperation with medical experts].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):642-6; discussion 647. PubMed ID: 9064940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Social law and the physician-nurse-patient relation in health care in East Germany].
    Heusinger H; Gürtler R
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1985; 79(12):511-4. PubMed ID: 4036179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Possible malpractice risk].
    Scheppokat KD; Neu J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Mar; 127(12):638. PubMed ID: 11963913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Responsibility of nurses. 10/13. Responsibility of psychiatric nurses].
    Génot-Pok I; Fournel S
    Soins; 2000 Mar; (643):53-4. PubMed ID: 11075233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The responsibility of the physician to inform the patient, from the jurisprudence viewpoint].
    Pentz A
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1985; 30():4-6. PubMed ID: 3861536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The crisis of medical responsibility].
    Fagnart JL
    Rev Med Brux; 1999 Jun; 20(3):127-8. PubMed ID: 10429534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The physician malpractice process, causes and proof].
    Dahse G
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1980; 38():9-12. PubMed ID: 7458862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The sanctioning of malpractice in the act of nursing care].
    Ségui S
    Soins; 2002 Nov; (670):42-4. PubMed ID: 12465377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Do we need a patients' rights legislation?].
    Schmidt K
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2007 Jan; 149(1-2):54. PubMed ID: 17619370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical profession and Consumer Protection Act.
    Choudhuri PK
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1993 Jul; 91(7):168-9. PubMed ID: 8263328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Revision of the medical malpractice law? Need for action and reform from the viewpoint of the physician].
    Bushe KA
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):564-7. PubMed ID: 9885161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical responsibility: mode of use].
    Paley-Vincent C
    Ann Pathol; 2000; 20 Suppl():S104-6. PubMed ID: 11261281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychiatric liability: abuse of the therapist-patient relationship.
    Gentry WC
    Trial; 1980 May; 16(5):26-9, 72. PubMed ID: 10247765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malpractice--a plaintiff's perspective.
    Zinman EJ
    J Am Coll Dent; 1997; 64(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 9270217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.