162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38614971)
1. A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy.
He Y; Fan Y; Song H; Shen Q; Ruan M; Chen Y; Li D; Li X; Liu Y; Zhang K; Zhang Q
BMC Urol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):85. PubMed ID: 38614971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized grade group for reporting prostate cancer grade in systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies.
He Y; Shen Q; Fu W; Wang H; Song G
Prostate; 2022 Aug; 82(11):1125-1132. PubMed ID: 35538399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Additional Systematic Biopsy Necessary in All Initial Prostate Biopsy Patients With Abnormal MRI?
Cheng X; Xu J; Chen Y; Liu Z; Sun G; Yang L; Yao J; Zeng H; Song B
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():643051. PubMed ID: 33718240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can fewer transperineal systematic biopsy cores have the same prostate cancer detection rate as of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy?
Liu H; Ruan M; Wang H; Wang H; Li X; Song G
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 32719353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensive sampling of the umbra and penumbra improves clinically significant prostate cancer detection and reduces risk of grade group upgrading at radical prostatectomy.
Lee AYM; Chen K; Cheng CWS; Ho HSS; Yuen JSP; Ngo NT; Law YM; Tay KJ
World J Urol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):2265-2271. PubMed ID: 37395756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel sampling scheme with reduced cores in men with multiparametric MRI-visible lesions undergoing prostate biopsy.
Ruan M; Wang H; Li X; Song G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jun; 48(6):2139-2147. PubMed ID: 37036488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Mistretta FA; Piccinelli ML; Lorusso V; Morelli M; Bianchi R; Catellani M; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Marvaso G; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):406-413. PubMed ID: 32989259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathological features of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 MRI lesions in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rahota RG; Diamand R; Malavaud B; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Peltier A; Beauval JB; Roumeguère T; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 34358405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of transperineal prostate targeted biopsy alone according to the PI-RADS score based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Noh TI; Shim JS; Kang SH; Cheon J; Kang SG
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1142022. PubMed ID: 37035173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.
Pham THN; Schulze-Hagen MF; Rahnama'i MS
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 Feb; 7(2):e1962. PubMed ID: 38217298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining targeted and systematic prostate biopsy improves prostate cancer detection and correlation with the whole mount histopathology in biopsy naïve and previous negative biopsy patients.
Mischinger J; Schöllnast H; Zurl H; Geyer M; Fischereder K; Adelsmayr G; Igrec J; Fritz G; Merdzo-Hörmann M; Elstner J; Schmid J; Triebl A; Trimmel V; Reiter C; Steiner J; Rosenlechner D; Seles M; Pichler GP; Pichler M; Riedl J; Schöpfer-Schwab S; Strobl J; Hutterer GC; Zigeuner R; Pummer K; Augustin H; Ahyai S; Mannweiler S; Fuchsjäger M; Talakic E
Front Surg; 2022; 9():1013389. PubMed ID: 36277287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of systematic, MRI-targeted biopsies alone or in combination for the prediction of unfavourable disease in MRI-positive low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; Beauval JB; Lesourd M; Almeras C; Assoun J; Aziza R; Gautier JR; Loison G; Portalez D; Salin A; Tollon C; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Roumiguié M
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):663-671. PubMed ID: 31197523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Targeted Biopsy and Combined Biopsy to Avoid Unnecessary Systematic Biopsy in Patients with PI-RADS 5 Lesions.
Yuan C; Li D; Wu J; Shen Q; Wang X; Xiao J; He Z; Zhou L; Li X; Liu Y; Zhao Z
Biomedicines; 2023 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 38137384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study.
Krausewitz P; Fostitsch D; Weiten R; Kluemper N; Stein J; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Ellinger J; Ritter M
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 36477403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection with various prostate sampling schemes based on different csPCa definitions.
Wang F; Chen T; Wang M; Chen H; Wang C; Liu P; Liu S; Luo J; Ma Q; Xu L
BMC Urol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):183. PubMed ID: 34949183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
