These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38616127)

  • 21. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and non-axial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis.
    de Vasconcellos LG; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I; Kojima AN
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):e546-51. PubMed ID: 24220463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combination of straight and tilted implants for supporting screw-retained dental prostheses in atrophic posterior maxillae: A 2-year prospective study.
    Casar-Espinosa JC; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Serrera-Figallo MÁ; Garrido-Serrano R; Lynch CD; Menéndez-Collar M; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():85-93. PubMed ID: 28587977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of two implant-supported fixed partial denture abutment designs: Influence on screw surface characteristics.
    Alzoubi FM; Sabti M; Alsarraf E; Alshahrani FA; Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 37208973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational Biomechanical Analysis of Engaging and Nonengaging Abutments for Implant Screw-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses.
    Savignano R; Soltanzadeh P; Suprono MS
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Aug; 30(7):604-609. PubMed ID: 33196135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Occlusal Scheme on All-on-Four Abutments, Screws, and Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Türker N; Alkiş HT; Sadowsky SJ; Şebnem Büyükkaplan U
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Feb; 47(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 32663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of two full-arch rehabilitations supported by four or five implants.
    Francetti L; Cavalli N; Villa T; La Barbera L; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Del Fabbro M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25830403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Effects of a Vertical Compressive Cyclic Load on Abutment Screws and the Stability of the Prosthesis in Nonengaging and Partially Engaging Abutments in a Screw-Retained Splinted Fixed Dental Prosthesis.
    Kwan JC; Kwan N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):571-578. PubMed ID: 35727250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis.
    Nishioka RS; Nishioka LN; Abreu CW; de Vasconcellos LG; Balducci I
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 20856998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in two implant-supported, screw-retained prostheses: A numerical and experimental study.
    Chen J; Guo J; Yang L; Wang L; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):240.e1-240.e10. PubMed ID: 37419710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure.
    Zincir ÖÖ; Parlar A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):646. PubMed ID: 34915864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.