These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38616156)
1. The 4D virtual patient: A proof of concept in digital dentistry. Lepidi L; Kim BC; Giberti L; Suriano C; Li J; Grande F J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38616156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The virtual patient in dental medicine. Joda T; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):725-6. PubMed ID: 24665872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique]. Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records. Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect Digital Workflow for Virtual Cross-Mounting of Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses to Create a 3D Virtual Patient. Lepidi L; Galli M; Grammatica A; Joda T; Wang HL; Li J J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):177-182. PubMed ID: 32865872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fully digital workflow to register maxillomandibular relation using a jaw motion tracer for fixed prosthetic rehabilitation: A technical report. Feng Y; Zhan L; Sun X; Li J; Liu W J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Oct; 35(7):1068-1076. PubMed ID: 37132534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incorporating a facial scanner into the digital workflow: A dental technique. Granata S; Giberti L; Vigolo P; Stellini E; Di Fiore A J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):781-785. PubMed ID: 31590978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans. Inoue N; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Lee SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans. Yang S; Dong B; Zhang Q; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator. Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Kois JC J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38778662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study. Hassan B; Gimenez Gonzalez B; Tahmaseb A; Greven M; Wismeijer D J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 27881321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery. Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The creation of a virtual dental patient with dynamic occlusion and its application in esthetic dentistry. Li Q; Bi M; Yang K; Liu W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 33323177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow. Kim SJ; Kang YJ; Kim JH J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37957064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the influence of the facial scanning method on the transfer accuracy of a maxillary digital scan to a 3D face scan for a virtual facebow technique: An in vitro study. Amezua X; Iturrate M; Garikano X; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 33722381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows. Osnes C; Patel J; Wagstaff A; Ferrari M; Keeling A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 34218536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A completely digital workflow aided by cone beam computed tomography scanning to maintain jaw relationships for implant-supported fixed complete dentures: A clinical study. Yan Y; Yue X; Lin X; Geng W J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):116-124. PubMed ID: 36549956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study. Lin H; Pan Y; Wei X; Wang Y; Yu H; Cheng H Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]