These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38617284)

  • 1. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".
    Bidelman GM; Bernard F; Skubic K
    bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38617284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musicians Show Improved Speech Segregation in Competitive, Multi-Talker Cocktail Party Scenarios.
    Bidelman GM; Yoo J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1927. PubMed ID: 32973610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2021 May; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.
    Monson BB; Rock J; Schulz A; Hoffman E; Buss E
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107773. PubMed ID: 31404807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
    Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.
    Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3132-9. PubMed ID: 1474228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous dynamics in behavior reveal interactions between perceptual warping in categorization and speech-in-noise perception.
    Bidelman GM; Carter JA
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1032369. PubMed ID: 36937676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise.
    Price CN; Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 235():118014. PubMed ID: 33794356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.