These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861764)

  • 1. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Goodman A; Reader A; Beck M; Melfi R; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1985 Jun; 11(6):249-56. PubMed ID: 3861764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes.
    Lev R; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):523-30. PubMed ID: 3482096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Histological evaluation of the efficiency of manual or ultrasonic instrumentation in upper molars (curved or twisted wide and narrow canals)].
    Esberard RM; Utrilla LS
    Odontol Clin; 1988; 2(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3267794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
    Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
    J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initiating endodontic therapy in posterior teeth. Part III. Mandibular molars.
    Weine FS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1983; 4(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 6586389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
    Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endodontic therapy on the mandibular second molar: easiest to treat of the difficult, molar teeth.
    Weine FS
    Compendium; 1994 Sep; 15(9):1130, 1133-6 passim; quiz 1140. PubMed ID: 7987904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular molar with 5 canals: report of a case.
    DeGrood ME; Cunningham CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Jan; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 9594750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge.
    De Moor RJ; Deroose CA; Calberson FL
    Int Endod J; 2004 Nov; 37(11):789-99. PubMed ID: 15479262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris.
    Fairbourn DR; McWalter GM; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):102-8. PubMed ID: 3471831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical investigation of in vivo endodontically treated mandibular and maxillary molars.
    Hartwell G; Bellizzi R
    J Endod; 1982 Dec; 8(12):555-7. PubMed ID: 6962275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA
    J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 3471836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [SEM evaluation of manual endodontics and a system using ultrasonics in canal preparation].
    Curiale F; Cassaro A; Margiotta V; Buzzanca R
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1985; 5(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 3870055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endosonic endodontics: the ultrasonic synergistic system.
    Martin H; Cunningham W
    Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 6592150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population.
    Ahmed HA; Abu-bakr NH; Yahia NA; Ibrahim YE
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):766-71. PubMed ID: 17714468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro evaluation of the need for accessory entries in the endodontic opening of lower molars].
    Mosimann JM; Lohmann LM; Soares IJ
    Rev Catarinense Odontol; 1980; 7(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 6939038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
    Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.