103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3861764)
1. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
Goodman A; Reader A; Beck M; Melfi R; Meyers W
J Endod; 1985 Jun; 11(6):249-56. PubMed ID: 3861764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes.
Lev R; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):523-30. PubMed ID: 3482096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Histological evaluation of the efficiency of manual or ultrasonic instrumentation in upper molars (curved or twisted wide and narrow canals)].
Esberard RM; Utrilla LS
Odontol Clin; 1988; 2(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3267794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initiating endodontic therapy in posterior teeth. Part III. Mandibular molars.
Weine FS
Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1983; 4(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 6586389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Endodontic therapy on the mandibular second molar: easiest to treat of the difficult, molar teeth.
Weine FS
Compendium; 1994 Sep; 15(9):1130, 1133-6 passim; quiz 1140. PubMed ID: 7987904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular molar with 5 canals: report of a case.
DeGrood ME; Cunningham CJ
J Endod; 1997 Jan; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 9594750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge.
De Moor RJ; Deroose CA; Calberson FL
Int Endod J; 2004 Nov; 37(11):789-99. PubMed ID: 15479262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris.
Fairbourn DR; McWalter GM; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):102-8. PubMed ID: 3471831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical investigation of in vivo endodontically treated mandibular and maxillary molars.
Hartwell G; Bellizzi R
J Endod; 1982 Dec; 8(12):555-7. PubMed ID: 6962275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved.
Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA
J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 3471836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [SEM evaluation of manual endodontics and a system using ultrasonics in canal preparation].
Curiale F; Cassaro A; Margiotta V; Buzzanca R
Stomatol Mediterr; 1985; 5(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 3870055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Endosonic endodontics: the ultrasonic synergistic system.
Martin H; Cunningham W
Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 6592150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population.
Ahmed HA; Abu-bakr NH; Yahia NA; Ibrahim YE
Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):766-71. PubMed ID: 17714468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [In vitro evaluation of the need for accessory entries in the endodontic opening of lower molars].
Mosimann JM; Lohmann LM; Soares IJ
Rev Catarinense Odontol; 1980; 7(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 6939038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
