121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38619486)
1. Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.
Hauck C; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jun; 50(6):636-653. PubMed ID: 38619486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence that proactive distractor suppression does not require attentional resources.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Tolomeo D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1376-1386. PubMed ID: 38049572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
Kim S; Cho YS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features.
Addleman DA; Störmer VS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1338-1346. PubMed ID: 35318583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Won BY; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.
Oxner M; Martinovic J; Forschack N; Lempe R; Gundlach C; Müller M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1705-1722. PubMed ID: 37023328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfer of statistical learning between tasks.
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):740-751. PubMed ID: 38722580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On preventing capture: Does greater salience cause greater suppression?
Hauck C; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2553-2566. PubMed ID: 36977905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.
Zhang Z; Gapelin N; Carlisle NB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 31650519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
