125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38619519)
1. [Clinical appraisal of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma: Report of 27 cases].
Wang LX; Zhang C; Yue DZ; Ge JP; Xu S; Dong J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Aug; 29(8):721-724. PubMed ID: 38619519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A laparoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy approach partly preserving great saphenous vein branches can benefit for patients with penile carcinoma.
Ma Y; Hao J; Yin H; Zhu M; Guan B; Zhu C; Dong B; Zhao S; He Z; Yang T
BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):138. PubMed ID: 35397549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morbidity of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation for squamous cell penile carcinoma.
Milathianakis C; Bogdanos J; Karamanolakis D
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):776-8. PubMed ID: 16174057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Coblentz TR; Theodorescu D
J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1386-9. PubMed ID: 12352399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Saphenous vein sparing during laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma patients.
Cui Y; Chen H; Liu L; Chen Z; Chen J; Qi L; Zu X
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Mar; 48(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 26660956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.
Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Saphenous-sparing laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Chiapparrone G; Rapisarda S; de Concilio B; Zeccolini G; Antoniutti M; Celia A
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):645-646. PubMed ID: 29064655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.
Yuan P; Zhao C; Liu Z; Ou Z; He W; Cai Y; Wang Y; Zu X; Qi L; Wang L
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 29256632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.
Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J
BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Double-channel expansion of the subcutaneous lower abdominal tunnel for sequential inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer - Report of six cases].
Liang Y; Xu LQ; Wang K; Yuan J; Wang X; Zu XB; Yu Y; Liu XM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Jul; 29(7):645-648. PubMed ID: 38619414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: surgical and oncological results.
Romanelli P; Nishimoto R; Suarez R; Decia R; Abreu D; Machado M; Arroyo C; Campolo H; Campos E; Carlos AS; Tobias-Machado M
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 May; 37(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 23433745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study.
Ma S; Zhang K; Li R; Lu J; Wu T; Liu Z; Fu X; Tang Q; Ma J
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e1-112.e9. PubMed ID: 35090820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results.
Jacobellis U
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1349-52. PubMed ID: 12629358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Dai B; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2103-8. PubMed ID: 19286211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-position robot-assisted versus laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A retrospective controlled study.
Ji A; Lyu J; Bai Y; Jiang J; Liu F
Asian J Surg; 2022 Aug; 45(8):1530-1534. PubMed ID: 35339347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preservation of the saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulval malignancies].
Zhang XL; Sheng XG; Li HQ; Chen ZY; Li DP; Li QS
Ai Zheng; 2007 Mar; 26(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 17355793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cancer of the penis: the value of systematic biopsy of the superficial inguinal lymph nodes in clinical N0 stage patients].
Bouchot O; Bouvier S; Bochereau G; Jeddi M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 8508206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
