190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38619763)
1. Utilizing artificial intelligence in academic writing: an in-depth evaluation of a scientific review on fertility preservation written by ChatGPT-4.
Safrai M; Orwig KE
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles.
Kacena MA; Plotkin LI; Fehrenbacher JC
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 38227177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Utility of AI in Writing a Scientific Review Article on the Impacts of COVID-19 on Musculoskeletal Health.
Awosanya OD; Harris A; Creecy A; Qiao X; Toepp AJ; McCune T; Kacena MA; Ozanne MV
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):146-151. PubMed ID: 38216806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?
Dashti M; Londono J; Ghasemi S; Moghaddasi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37438164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of AI Language Engine ChatGPT 4.0 to Write a Scientific Review Article Examining the Intersection of Alzheimer's Disease and Bone.
Margetts TJ; Karnik SJ; Wang HS; Plotkin LI; Oblak AL; Fehrenbacher JC; Kacena MA; Movila A
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):177-181. PubMed ID: 38225472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.
Pan ET; Florian-Rodriguez M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38710267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strengths and Weaknesses of ChatGPT Models for Scientific Writing About Medical Vitamin B12: Mixed Methods Study.
Abuyaman O
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e49459. PubMed ID: 37948100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.
Kim HJ; Yang JH; Chang DG; Lenke LG; Pizones J; Castelein R; Watanabe K; Trobisch PD; Mundis GM; Suh SW; Suk SI
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jun; 26():e52001. PubMed ID: 38924787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study.
Mugaanyi J; Cai L; Cheng S; Lu C; Huang J
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e52935. PubMed ID: 38578685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study.
Hansen S; Brandt CJ; Søndergaard J
JMIR AI; 2024 Jan; 3():e49082. PubMed ID: 38875597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using AI to Write a Review Article Examining the Role of the Nervous System on Skeletal Homeostasis and Fracture Healing.
Nazzal MK; Morris AJ; Parker RS; White FA; Natoli RM; Fehrenbacher JC; Kacena MA
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):217-221. PubMed ID: 38217755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.
Cheng SL; Tsai SJ; Bai YM; Ko CH; Hsu CW; Yang FC; Tsai CK; Tu YK; Yang SN; Tseng PT; Hsu TW; Liang CS; Su KP
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51229. PubMed ID: 38145486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.
Májovský M; Černý M; Kasal M; Komarc M; Netuka D
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46924. PubMed ID: 37256685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.
Athaluri SA; Manthena SV; Kesapragada VSRKM; Yarlagadda V; Dave T; Duddumpudi RTS
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37432. PubMed ID: 37182055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The promise and peril of using a large language model to obtain clinical information: ChatGPT performs strongly as a fertility counseling tool with limitations.
Chervenak J; Lieman H; Blanco-Breindel M; Jindal S
Fertil Steril; 2023 Sep; 120(3 Pt 2):575-583. PubMed ID: 37217092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Readiness of ChatGPT to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently: A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and Artificial Intelligence.
Buholayka M; Zouabi R; Tadinada A
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e39386. PubMed ID: 37378091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.
Huang J; Tan M
Am J Cancer Res; 2023; 13(4):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 37168339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the accuracy of ChatGPT references in head and neck and ENT disciplines.
Frosolini A; Franz L; Benedetti S; Vaira LA; de Filippis C; Gennaro P; Marioni G; Gabriele G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):5129-5133. PubMed ID: 37679532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation.
Khlaif ZN; Mousa A; Hattab MK; Itmazi J; Hassan AA; Sanmugam M; Ayyoub A
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e47049. PubMed ID: 37707884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles.
Benichou L;
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 124(5):101456. PubMed ID: 36966950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
