115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38619787)
1. Inter- and intra-observer variability of qualitative visual breast-composition assessment in mammography among Japanese physicians: a first multi-institutional observer performance study in Japan.
Koyama Y; Nakashima K; Orihara S; Tsunoda H; Kimura F; Uenaka N; Ban K; Michishita Y; Kanemaki Y; Kurihara A; Tawaraya K; Taguri M; Ishikawa T; Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.
Adibelli ZH; Ergenc R; Oztekin O; Ecevit S; Unal G; Abal Y
Breast Care (Basel); 2010 Mar; 5(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 22619635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To asses inter- and intra-observer variability for breast density and BIRADS assessment categories in mammographic reporting.
Masroor I; Rasool M; Saeed SA; Sohail S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 26819167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of inter- and intra-observer variability of breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth editions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Alikhassi A; Esmaili Gourabi H; Baikpour M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2018; 5():67-72. PubMed ID: 29707614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in the interpretation of [(18)F]choline PET/CT examinations in patients suffering from biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following curative treatment.
Pegard C; Gallazzini-Crépin C; Giai J; Dubreuil J; Caoduro C; Desruet MD; Roux J; Calizzano A; Fagret D; Lamesa C; Boulahdour H; Vuillez JP
EJNMMI Res; 2014; 4():25. PubMed ID: 25006544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study.
Ciccone G; Vineis P; Frigerio A; Segnan N
Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28A(6-7):1054-8. PubMed ID: 1627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated Breast Density Assessment in MRI Using Deep Learning and Radiomics: Strategies for Reducing Inter-Observer Variability.
Jing X; Wielema M; Monroy-Gonzalez AG; Stams TRG; Mahesh SVK; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE; Dorrius MD; van Ooijen PMA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37846440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer variability in multi ultrasound descriptor assessment of thyroid nodules.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Migda B; Krauze A; Mlosek K; Słapa RZ; Wareluk P; Bakuła-Zalewska E; Adamczewski Z; Lewiński A; Jakubowski W; Dedecjus M
J Ultrason; 2019 Nov; 19(78):198-206. PubMed ID: 31807325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Between Embryologists for Cytoplasmic String Assessment in Day 5/6 Human Blastocysts.
Eastick J; Venetis C; Cooke S; Chapman M
Reprod Sci; 2023 Jun; 30(6):1917-1926. PubMed ID: 36538029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability and the Effect of Experience in Cine-MRI for Adhesion Detection.
de Wilde B; Joosten F; Venderink W; Davidse MEJ; Geurts J; Kruijt H; Vermeulen A; Martens B; Schyns MVP; Huige JCBM; de Boer MC; Tonino BAR; Zandvoort HJA; Lammert K; Parviainen H; Vuorinen AM; Syväranta S; Vogels RRM; Prins W; Coppola A; Bossa N; Ten Broek RPG; Huisman H
J Imaging; 2023 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36976106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Hepple Classification Used in the Diagnosis of Talus Osteochondral Lesions.
Ilyas G; Burak F
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2023 Sep; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 37656685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
