These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38620715)

  • 1. Comparison of KingVision videolaryngoscope channelled blade with Tuoren videolaryngoscope non-channelled blade in a simulated COVID-19 intubation scenario by non-anaesthesiologists and experienced anaesthesiologists: A prospective randomised crossover mannequin study.
    Gupta A; Trikha A; Ayub A; Bhattacharjee S; Aravindan A; Gupta N; Prakash K; Aggarwal R; Ganesh V; Soni KD; Malhotra RK
    Trends Anaesth Crit Care; 2021 Jun; 38():42-48. PubMed ID: 38620715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision
    Mendonca C; Ungureanu N; Nowicka A; Kumar P
    Anaesthesia; 2018 Jul; 73(7):847-855. PubMed ID: 29660807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of C-MAC and McGrathMAC Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation in Patients with Normal Airway by Donned Anaesthesiologists Using an Intubation Box During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective, Randomized Study.
    Gupta N; Sarma R; Vig S; Kumar V; Gupta A; Mishra S
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2022 Aug; 50(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 35979971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Videolaryngoscopy for Physician-Based, Prehospital Emergency Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Comparison of Different Blade Types Using A.P. Advance, C-MAC System, and KingVision.
    Cavus E; Janssen S; Reifferscheid F; Caliebe A; Callies A; von der Heyden M; Knacke PG; Doerges V
    Anesth Analg; 2018 May; 126(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 29239965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of three unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a randomised, controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Buttenberg M; Greif R; Nabecker S; Theiler L
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Mar; 72(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 27882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of King Vision videolaryngoscope channeled and non-channeled blades with direct laryngoscope for intubation performance and skill retention by medical students: a randomized cross over two period study.
    Gupta N; Kabra P; Mandal S; Gupta A; Sarma R; Malhotra RK
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Apr; 37(2):541-547. PubMed ID: 36399215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intubation success and glottic visualization using King Vision and C-MAC videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine injuries with cervical immobilization: A randomized clinical trial.
    Shravanalakshmi D; Bidkar PU; Narmadalakshmi K; Lata S; Mishra SK; Adinarayanan S
    Surg Neurol Int; 2017; 8():19. PubMed ID: 28217398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and performance testing of the low-cost, 3D-printed, smartphone-compatible 'Tansen Videolaryngoscope' vs. Pentax-AWS videolaryngoscope vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscope: A manikin study.
    Lambert CT; John SC; John AV
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2020 Nov; 37(11):992-998. PubMed ID: 32675700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Greif R; Schoettker P; Savoldelli GL; Nabecker S; Theiler LG
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 May; 116(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 27106971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy of C-MAC
    Gupta A; Singh P; Gupta N; Kumar Malhotra R; Girdhar KK
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 34153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial.
    Smereka J; Madziala M; Dunder D; Makomaska-Szaroszyk E; Szarpak L
    Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Jun; 178(6):937-945. PubMed ID: 30976922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard and flexible tip bougie for tracheal intubation using a non-channelled hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: a randomised comparison.
    Oxenham O; Pairaudeau C; Moody T; Mendonca C
    Anaesthesia; 2022 Dec; 77(12):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 36066179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins.
    Eismann H; Sieg L; Etti N; Friedrich L; Schröter C; Mommsen P; Krettek C; Zeckey C
    Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):27. PubMed ID: 28797305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A feasibility study of awake videolaryngoscope-assisted intubation in patients with periglottic tumour using the channelled King Vision
    Markova L; Stopar-Pintaric T; Luzar T; Benedik J; Hodzovic I
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):512-518. PubMed ID: 27928826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID-19 era: A manikin based pilot study.
    Kannaujia A; Haldar R; Shamim R; Mishra P; Agarwal A
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2021; 15(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 34188622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled Glidescope
    Brozek T; Bruthans J; Porizka M; Blaha J; Ulrichova J; Michalek P
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33260374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The KINGVISION: clinical assessment of performance in 50 patients].
    Shimada N; Hayashi K; Sugimoto K; Takahashi M; Niwa Y; Takeuchi M
    Masui; 2013 Jun; 62(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 23815009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Huang P; Qiu Y; Xu T; Sun X; Lu Z; Zhang Y; Yu J; Wu J; Su D; Huang Z
    J Clin Anesth; 2023 Dec; 91():111274. PubMed ID: 37801823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial.
    Decamps P; Grillot N; Le Thuaut A; Brule N; Lejus-Bourdeau C; Reignier J; Lascarrou JB
    Ann Intensive Care; 2021 Aug; 11(1):126. PubMed ID: 34398347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.