131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38621833)
1. Towards an optimal design of a functionally graded porous uncemented acetabular component using genetic algorithm.
Saviour CM; Gupta S
Med Eng Phys; 2024 Apr; 126():104159. PubMed ID: 38621833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design of a functionally graded porous uncemented acetabular component: Influence of polar gradation.
Saviour CM; Gupta S
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 39(6):e3709. PubMed ID: 37089063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical Evaluations of an Uncemented Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Effects of Loading and Interface Conditions.
Saviour CM; Banerjee Chowdhury J; Gupta S
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Feb; 145(2):. PubMed ID: 36149021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Graves SE; Bingham R
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 34699913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Topology optimization of 3D-printed structurally porous cage for acetabular reinforcement in total hip arthroplasty.
Moussa A; Rahman S; Xu M; Tanzer M; Pasini D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103705. PubMed ID: 32279849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years.
Crowther JD; Lachiewicz PF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 12004013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of the pelvic bone on the computational results of the acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis.
Barreto S; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Monteiro J
J Biomech Eng; 2010 May; 132(5):054503. PubMed ID: 20459214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does a Monoblock Acetabular Component With a Ceramic Liner Cause More Pelvic Bone Loss Than a Conventional Modular Cementless Acetabular Component? A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fischman D; Mahatma MM; Slullitel P; Farzi M; Grammatopoulos G; Poitras S; Wilkinson JM; Beaulé PE
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 34649747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery.
Ciriviri J; Nestorovski Z; Talevski D; Vranishkovski T; Kostov H
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2019 Oct; 40(2):33-39. PubMed ID: 31605583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Survival of Contemporary Cementless Acetabular Components Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Wilson JM; Maradit-Kremers H; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Mabry TM; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Sierra RJ; Taunton MJ; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S194-S200. PubMed ID: 37028772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis.
Schmalzried TP; Guttmann D; Grecula M; Amstutz HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 May; 76(5):677-88. PubMed ID: 8175815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metal-backed acetabular components with conventional polyethylene: a review of 9113 primary components with a follow-up of 20 years.
Hallan G; Dybvik E; Furnes O; Havelin LI
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Feb; 92(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 20130308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design optimization of cementless metal-backed cup prostheses using the concept of functionally graded material.
Hedia HS; El-Midany TT; Shabara MA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater; 2006 Sep; 1(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 18458393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years.
Schmalzried TP; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Sep; 74(8):1130-9. PubMed ID: 1400541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.
van der Veen HC; van Jonbergen HP; Poolman RW; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Int Orthop; 2013 Jan; 37(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 23229800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large head metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty versus 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene cementless total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.
Zijlstra WP; Bos N; van Raaij JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Oct; 9():136. PubMed ID: 18842151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accelerated polyethylene wear and early failure of the uncemented Reflection acetabular component: a ten to fifteen-year follow-up study.
Clement ND; Mitchell M; Trayner ME; Porter DE; Lawson GM; Burnett R
Int Orthop; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2337-43. PubMed ID: 23974837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical pelvic loading of a monoblock polyethylene acetabular component.
Young PS; Macarico DT; Silverwood RK; Farhan-Alanie OM; Mohammed A; Periasamy K; Nicol A; Meek RMD
Bone Joint J; 2021 May; 103-B(5):872-880. PubMed ID: 33934654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
