168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38622248)
1. Comparison of DNA extraction methods on different sample matrices within the same terrestrial ecosystem.
Galla G; Praeg N; Rzehak T; Sprecher E; Colla F; Seeber J; Illmer P; Hauffe HC
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8715. PubMed ID: 38622248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mock community as an in situ positive control for amplicon sequencing of microbiotas from the same ecosystem.
Galla G; Praeg N; Colla F; Rzehak T; Illmer P; Seeber J; Hauffe HC
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4056. PubMed ID: 36906688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of four DNA extraction kits efficiency for 16SrDNA microbiota profiling of diverse human samples.
Gall-David SL; Boudry G; Buffet-Bataillon S
Future Sci OA; 2023 Jan; 9(1):FSO837. PubMed ID: 37006230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.
Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J
Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Kennedy NA; Walker AW; Berry SH; Duncan SH; Farquarson FM; Louis P; Thomson JM; ; Satsangi J; Flint HJ; Parkhill J; Lees CW; Hold GL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88982. PubMed ID: 24586470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types.
Abundo MEC; Ngunjiri JM; Taylor KJM; Ji H; Ghorbani A; K C M; Weber BP; Johnson TJ; Lee CW
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0241732. PubMed ID: 33406075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling.
Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications.
Gerasimidis K; Bertz M; Quince C; Brunner K; Bruce A; Combet E; Calus S; Loman N; Ijaz UZ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():365. PubMed ID: 27456340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast.
Flint A; Laidlaw A; Li L; Raitt C; Rao M; Cooper A; Weedmark K; Carrillo C; Tamber S
BMC Microbiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 36180850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of DNA Sequencing and Analysis Methods on 16S rRNA Gene Bacterial Community Analysis of Dairy Products.
Xue Z; Kable ME; Marco ML
mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30333179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in the gut microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits.
Baek C; Kim WJ; Moon J; Moon SY; Kim W; Hu HJ; Min J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264291. PubMed ID: 35271591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of DNA extraction kits and phylogenetic diversity of the porcine gastrointestinal tract based on Illumina sequencing of two hypervariable regions.
Burbach K; Seifert J; Pieper DH; Camarinha-Silva A
Microbiologyopen; 2016 Feb; 5(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 26541370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the impact of storage conditions on microbial community composition in soil samples.
Rubin BE; Gibbons SM; Kennedy S; Hampton-Marcell J; Owens S; Gilbert JA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70460. PubMed ID: 23936206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for 16s rRNA microbiota profiling of human faecal samples.
Sinclair J; West NP; Cox AJ
BMC Res Notes; 2023 Aug; 16(1):169. PubMed ID: 37568179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial Diversity Patterns Differ in Soils Developing in Sub-tropical and Cool-Temperate Ecosystems.
Shanmugam SG; Magbanua ZV; Williams MA; Jangid K; Whitman WB; Peterson DG; Kingery WL
Microb Ecol; 2017 Apr; 73(3):556-569. PubMed ID: 27889811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota.
Li M; Gong J; Cottrill M; Yu H; de Lange C; Burton J; Topp E
J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 12732417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical Evaluation of Metaproteomics and 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Techniques for Study of Gut Microbiota Establishment in Infants with Cystic Fibrosis.
Saralegui C; García-Durán C; Romeu E; Hernáez-Sánchez ML; Maruri A; Bastón-Paz N; Lamas A; Vicente S; Pérez-Ruiz E; Delgado I; Luna-Paredes C; Caballero JD; Zamora J; Monteoliva L; Gil C; Del Campo R
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0146622. PubMed ID: 36255300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How, When, and Where Relic DNA Affects Microbial Diversity.
Lennon JT; Muscarella ME; Placella SA; Lehmkuhl BK
mBio; 2018 Jun; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 29921664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations.
Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A
Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
