These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3862235)

  • 1. Electrochemical potentials of amalgam restorations in vivo.
    Nilner K; Holland RI
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Aug; 93(4):357-9. PubMed ID: 3862235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrosion potential variation of aged dental amalgam restorations over time.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Hall GC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 16084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corrosion potential recovery of dental amalgam restorations following prophylaxis.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet JP; Maillet WA; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):840-3. PubMed ID: 16934322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo galvanic currents of intermittently contacting dental amalgam and other metallic restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):823-31. PubMed ID: 15451237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Existence of an electrically insulating layer in amalgam-containing galvanic couples.
    Sutow EJ; Taylor JC; Maillet WA; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):874-9. PubMed ID: 18093640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical potentials of restorations in subjects without oral complaints.
    Muller AW; Van Loon LA; Davidson CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Sep; 17(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 2231160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration.
    Welbury RR; Walls AW; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1990 Dec 8-22; 169(11):361-6. PubMed ID: 2275837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrochemical study of insulating properties of dental amalgam bonding polymers.
    Toumelin-Chemla F; Degrange M
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1429-38. PubMed ID: 9651015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist J; Qvist V; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Oct; 48(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 2251918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental microleakage around ageing dental amalgam restorations: a review.
    Jodaikin A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Nov; 8(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 7031205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of amalgam restorations in a south-western Nigerian population.
    Oginni AO; Olusile AO
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Mar; 29(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11896848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.