These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3862235)

  • 21. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Quality assessment of amalgam restorations provided for primary school children].
    Lusananda S; Panya-ngarm R; Charoensupaya O
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1991; 41(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 1918568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations.
    Sammut E; Deery C; Nugent Z; Ibbetson R
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):811-6. PubMed ID: 16687199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of the condensation instrument on the clinical behaviour of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Mar; 14(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3470463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea.
    Mjör IA; Um CM
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 8276514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 1437690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Considerations in measuring the electrical potentials of metallic restorations in vivo.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hanrahan KL; Hall GC; Harandi K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Nov; 27(11):927-34. PubMed ID: 11106983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation between amalgam restorations and mercury concentrations in urine.
    Olstad ML; Holland RI; Wandel N; Pettersen AH
    J Dent Res; 1987 Jun; 66(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 3476590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On intraoral potential- and polarization-measurements of metallic restorations. A methodological and time dependent clinical study.
    Nilner K; Glantz PO; Zöger B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1982; 40(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 6960627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students.
    Quadir F; Ali Abidi SY; Ahmed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jul; 24(7):485-8. PubMed ID: 25052971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative study of bonded and non-bonded amalgam restorations in general dental practice.
    Worskett P
    Br Dent J; 2013 Apr; 214(7):E19. PubMed ID: 23579163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical quality of amalgam restorations.
    Skogedal O; Helöe LA
    Scand J Dent Res; 1979 Dec; 87(6):459-61. PubMed ID: 397610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.