119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38623859)
1. Comparison of the Efficacies of Vicryl Rapide and Prolene Sutures in Transcolumellar Incision.
Savran F; Bayram F
Otolaryngol Pol; 2024 Apr; 78(2):23-28. PubMed ID: 38623859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Rhinoplasty.
Alinasab B; Haraldsson PO
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 27251749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes.
Erol O; Buyuklu F; Koycu A; Jafarov S; Gultekin G; Erbek SS
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 44(5):1759-1765. PubMed ID: 32700009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of scar outcomes of alar flare region using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures: a single-blind study.
Ceylan ME; Balıkçı HH
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S133-S139. PubMed ID: 35729041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Columellar Scarring.
Bozan A; Dizdar D
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 May; 32(3):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 33405440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cosmetic outcomes of lacerations on the extremities and trunk using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures.
Tejani C; Sivitz AB; Rosen MD; Nakanishi AK; Flood RG; Clott MA; Saccone PG; Luck RP
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 25039547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
Parell GJ; Becker GD
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast
Hemalatha Devi D; Bolanthakodi C; D'Cunha P; Bheema Bai M; Kumar Moharana A; Ts D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():1179. PubMed ID: 37388624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 6-0 nylon versus 6-0 vicryl rapide in chieloplasty.
Rao JK; Luthra P; Arya V; Siwach V; Sheorain AK; Gupta M
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2016; 6(2):272-277. PubMed ID: 28299270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material].
Szabó S; István G
Magy Seb; 2002 Apr; 55(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12049012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery.
Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S
Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.
Niessen FB; Spauwen PH; Kon M
Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Sep; 39(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 9326705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Columellar Scar Following Open Rhinoplasty Using Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture: A Meta-Analysis.
Kenny H; Jonas RH; Oyer S
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2023; 25(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34516890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vicryl Rapide versus Vicryl suture in skin closure of the hand in children: a randomized prospective study.
Al-Qattan MM
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 15620501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevention of incisional hernia using different suture materials for closing the abdominal wall: a comparison of PDS, Vicryl and Prolene in a rat model.
van Steensel S; van den Hil LCL; Bloemen A; Gijbels MJ; Breukink SO; Melenhorst J; Lenaerts K; Bouvy ND
Hernia; 2020 Feb; 24(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 31111322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateral tarsal strip procedure: comparison of absorbable sutures and non-absorbable polypropylene suture. Does the suture type matter?
Moledina M; Ahmed I; Ranji A; Chipeta C; Caesar R; Malik A
Eye (Lond); 2024 Mar; 38(4):752-756. PubMed ID: 37857715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
Zeplin PH; Schmidt K; Laske M; Ziegler UE
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suture choice matters in rabbit model of laparoscopic, preperitoneal, inguinal hernia repair.
Kelly KB; Krpata DM; Blatnik JA; Ponsky TA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 24784781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene®) and Delayed Absorbable Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) Suture Material in Mass Closure of Vertical Laparotomy Wounds.
Pandey S; Singh M; Singh K; Sandhu S
Indian J Surg; 2013 Aug; 75(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 24426459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
