143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38624083)
1. AutoDock-SS: AutoDock for Multiconformational Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
Ni B; Wang H; Khalaf HKS; Blay V; Houston DR
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3779-3789. PubMed ID: 38624083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FINDSITE(comb): a threading/structure-based, proteomic-scale virtual ligand screening approach.
Zhou H; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):230-40. PubMed ID: 23240691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods.
Venkatraman V; Pérez-Nueno VI; Mavridis L; Ritchie DW
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2079-93. PubMed ID: 21090728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel approach for efficient pharmacophore-based virtual screening: method and applications.
Dror O; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Inbar Y; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2333-43. PubMed ID: 19803502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An unbiased method to build benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening and its application to GPCRs.
Xia J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L; Wang XS
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1433-50. PubMed ID: 24749745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 7. Impact of protein flexibility and water molecules on docking-based virtual screening accuracy.
Therrien E; Weill N; Tomberg A; Corbeil CR; Lee D; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3198-210. PubMed ID: 25280064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.
Rueda M; Bottegoni G; Abagyan R
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jan; 50(1):186-93. PubMed ID: 20000587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved Method of Structure-Based Virtual Screening via Interaction-Energy-Based Learning.
Yasuo N; Sekijima M
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 30808172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.
Chen L; Cruz A; Ramsey S; Dickson CJ; Duca JS; Hornak V; Koes DR; Kurtzman T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220113. PubMed ID: 31430292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
Wei NN; Hamza A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
Huang SY
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fragment-Based Analysis of Ligand Dockings Improves Classification of Actives.
Belew RK; Forli S; Goodsell DS; O'Donnell TJ; Olson AJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1597-607. PubMed ID: 27384036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
