These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38627325)
21. A Stan tutorial on Bayesian IRTree models: Conventional models and explanatory extension. Xue M; Chen Y Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1817-1837. PubMed ID: 37095325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data. Huang HY Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1168-1195. PubMed ID: 33116331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Item response theory scoring and the detection of curvilinear relationships. Carter NT; Dalal DK; Guan L; LoPilato AC; Withrow SA Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 27819433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework. Brown A Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal? Tay L; Drasgow F; Rounds J; Williams BA J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1287-304. PubMed ID: 19702371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Relationship of Insufficient Effort Responding and Response Styles: An Online Experiment. Alarcon GM; Lee MA Front Psychol; 2021; 12():784375. PubMed ID: 35095672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles. Falk CF; Cai L Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):328-47. PubMed ID: 26641273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial. Böckenholt U; Meiser T Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rejoinder to Commentaries on Lyu, Bolt and Westby's "Exploring the Effects of Item Specific Factors in Sequential and IRTree Models". Lyu W; Bolt DM Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 37326910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Explaining Variability in Response Style Traits: A Covariate-Adjusted IRTree. Ames AJ; Myers AJ Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Aug; 81(4):756-780. PubMed ID: 34267399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A within-person examination of the ideal-point response process. LaPalme M; Tay L; Wang W Psychol Assess; 2018 May; 30(5):567-581. PubMed ID: 28557481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement. Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A General Unfolding IRT Model for Multiple Response Styles. Liu CW; Wang WC Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 31019356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A General Bayesian Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model for Small and Large Samples. Fujimoto KA; Neugebauer SR Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Aug; 80(4):665-694. PubMed ID: 32616954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ideal Point Modeling of Non-cognitive Constructs: Review and Recommendations for Research. Tay L; Ng V Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2423. PubMed ID: 30618909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]