These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38627325)

  • 41. Simple-Structure Multidimensional Item Response Theory Equating for Multidimensional Tests.
    Kim SY; Lee WC; Kolen MJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Feb; 80(1):91-125. PubMed ID: 31933494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.
    Ames AJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):281-306. PubMed ID: 35185160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Effects of Questionnaire Length on the Relative Impact of Response Styles in Ambulatory Assessment.
    Hasselhorn K; Ottenstein C; Meiser T; Lischetzke T
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(5):1043-1057. PubMed ID: 38779850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Measuring global physical health in children with cerebral palsy: illustration of a multidimensional bi-factor model and computerized adaptive testing.
    Haley SM; Ni P; Dumas HM; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Hambleton RK; Montpetit K; Bilodeau N; Gorton GE; Watson K; Tucker CA
    Qual Life Res; 2009 Apr; 18(3):359-70. PubMed ID: 19221892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Incorporating the Q-Matrix Into Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
    da Silva MA; Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bazán JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):665-687. PubMed ID: 32655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Matches Made With Information: Fitting Measurement Models to Adult Attachment Data.
    Sun T; Fraley RC; Drasgow F
    Assessment; 2021 Oct; 28(7):1828-1847. PubMed ID: 33185133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.
    Teresi JA; Wang C; Kleinman M; Jones RN; Weiss DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Sep; 86(3):674-711. PubMed ID: 34251615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?
    Ling Y; Zhang M; Locke KD; Li G; Li Z
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 26421444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Robustness of Projective IRT to Misspecification of the Underlying Multidimensional Model.
    Strachan T; Ip E; Fu Y; Ackerman T; Chen SH; Willse J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):362-375. PubMed ID: 32879536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Regularized Variational Estimation for Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Cho AE; Xiao J; Wang C; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):347-375. PubMed ID: 35831697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):560-576. PubMed ID: 33017166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Advances in modelling response styles and related phenomena.
    Khorramdel L; Jeon M; Leigh Wang L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 31721155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bayesian Adaptive Lasso for Detecting Item-Trait Relationship and Differential Item Functioning in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
    Shan N; Xu PF
    Psychometrika; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39127801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An Illustration of an IRTree Model for Disengagement.
    Leventhal BC; Pastor D
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Aug; 84(4):810-834. PubMed ID: 39055098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores.
    Falk CF; Ju U
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():72. PubMed ID: 32116902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.
    Hickie IB; Scott EM; Cross SP; Iorfino F; Davenport TA; Guastella AJ; Naismith SL; Carpenter JS; Rohleder C; Crouse JJ; Hermens DF; Koethe D; Markus Leweke F; Tickell AM; Sawrikar V; Scott J
    Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211 Suppl 9():S3-S46. PubMed ID: 31679171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Comparison of Two IRTree Models to Investigate the Impact of Full Versus Endpoint-Only Response Option Labeling.
    Spratto EM; Leventhal BC; Bandalos DL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Feb; 81(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 33456061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.
    Cai Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1181-5. PubMed ID: 26043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A New Approach to Desirable Responding: Multidimensional Item Response Model of Overclaiming Data.
    Jin KY; Paulhus DL; Shih CL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 May; 47(3):221-236. PubMed ID: 37113521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.