134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38627750)
1. Evaluation of objective and subjective binocular ocular refraction with looking in type.
Fukushima M; Hirota M; Yukimori T; Hayashi A; Hirohara Y; Saika M; Matsuoka K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):170. PubMed ID: 38627750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects.
Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Handa T; Ando W; Kawamorita T; Igarashi A; Shimizu K
Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():12606. PubMed ID: 26218972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.
Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T
Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
Dave T; Fukuma Y
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Observation of visual quality after implantation of a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens with a low addition region using the micromonovision design].
Li YW; Liu Y; Li X; Wang SN; Zheng GY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 59(12):1019-1029. PubMed ID: 38061903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a Novel Binocular Refraction System with Standard Digital Phoropter Refraction.
Bossie T; Reilly J; Vera-Diaz FA
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jul; 100(7):451-458. PubMed ID: 37369097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of an automated subjective refractor.
Sheedy J; Schanz P; Bullimore M
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 15181358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance of Accommodation and Eye Dominance for Measuring Objective Refractions.
Tsuneyoshi Y; Negishi K; Tsubota K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 177():69-76. PubMed ID: 28237412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective Verification of Physiologic Changes during Accommodation under Binocular, Monocular, and Pinhole Conditions.
Park H; Park IK; Shin JH; Chun YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 34(4):e32. PubMed ID: 30686953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective refraction using power vectors by updating a conventional phoropter with a Stokes lens for continuous astigmatic power generation.
Moreno JRA; Micó V; Albarrán Diego C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 37264763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study on the difference of binocular accommodative response between atients with intermittent exotropia under different viewing condition].
Shen PC; Zhang Y; Liu Y; Jiang J; Xu JJ; Lin HL; Xu D
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 54(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 29429288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement Accuracy When Using Spot Vision Screener With or Without Cycloplegia in Young Adults.
Tatara S; Maeda F; Ubukata H; Shiga Y; Yaoeda K
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3543-3548. PubMed ID: 38026593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
Hasegawa Y; Hiraoka T; Nakano S; Okamoto F; Oshika T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202340. PubMed ID: 30106991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
Tilia D; Sha J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jul; 45(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 30601291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of orthokeratology lens wear on binocular vision and accommodation: A short-term prospective study.
Kang P; Watt K; Chau T; Zhu J; Evans BJW; Swarbrick H
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Dec; 41(6):501-506. PubMed ID: 30224265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
