These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38627750)

  • 21. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
    Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Study of the Usefulness of the Binocular Spot Vision Screener Autorefractor in the Detection of Childhood Visual Disorders.
    Voide N; Hoeckele N; Kaeser PF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2018 Apr; 235(4):416-419. PubMed ID: 29590687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
    He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction.
    Seidemann A; Schaeffel F
    Vision Res; 2003 Feb; 43(4):419-30. PubMed ID: 12535999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia.
    Goodwin RT; Romano PE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Jul; 26(7):917-23. PubMed ID: 4008208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of unilateral uncorrected astigmatism on binocular vision and fixation disparity.
    Nilsson A; Nilsson M; Stevenson SB; Brautaset RL
    Strabismus; 2011 Dec; 19(4):138-41. PubMed ID: 22107117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the Netra smartphone refractor to subjective refraction.
    Tousignant B; Garceau MC; Bouffard-Saint-Pierre N; Bellemare MM; Hanssens JM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Jul; 103(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 31773810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective versus objective refraction in healthy young adults.
    Kozlov Y; Kinori M; Armarnik S; Yahalomi T; Ekshtein A; Levian L; Mezad-Koursh D; Pikkel J; Ben-Ari O
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38378511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptance.
    Atchison DA; Schmid KL; Edwards KP; Muller SM; Robotham J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jul; 21(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 11430618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal dynamics of ocular aberrations: monocular vs binocular vision.
    Mira-Agudelo A; Lundström L; Artal P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 19422556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An experimental study on the objective measurement of accommodative amplitude under binocular and natural viewing conditions.
    Otake Y; Miyao M; Ishihara S; Kashiwamata M; Kondo T; Sakakibara H; Yamada S
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Jun; 170(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 8266330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T; Shoji T; Yoshikawa Y; Mine I; Kanno J; Ishii H; Saito A; Ishikawa S; Kimura I; Shinoda K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of vision performance of spectacles prescribed to 0.05D versus 0.25D steps.
    Jia T; Tilia D; Papas E; Stapleton F; Zhen Y; Conrad F; Tan J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Jan; 107(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 37082792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.
    García-Pérez JL; Gros-Otero J; Sánchez-Ramos C; Blázquez V; Contreras I
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28514944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact on binocular visual function of small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia.
    Gyldenkerne A; Ivarsen A; Nisted I; Hjortdal J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):430-438. PubMed ID: 33181628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monocular and binocular reading performance in subjects with normal binocular vision.
    Johansson J; Pansell T; Ygge J; Seimyr GÖ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jul; 97(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 24612111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients.
    Boxer Wachler BS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 12648637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Myopia Using the WaveLight Refractive Suite.
    Cummings A; Durrie D; Gordon M; Williams R; Gow JA; Maus M
    J Refract Surg; 2017 May; 33(5):322-328. PubMed ID: 28486723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.