These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38627819)

  • 1. 3D printing vs traditional workflow for the fabrication of mandibular implant overdentures: study protocol for a mixed-methods cross-over RCT.
    Jafarpour D; El-Amier N; Feine J; Bedos C; Abi-Nader S; Esfandiari S; Shuster T; Zimmermann E; de Souza R
    Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):267. PubMed ID: 38627819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-implant overdentures retained by the Novaloc attachment system: study protocol for a mixed-methods randomized cross-over trial.
    de Souza RF; Bedos C; Esfandiari S; Makhoul NM; Dagdeviren D; Abi Nader S; Jabbar AA; Feine JS
    Trials; 2018 Apr; 19(1):243. PubMed ID: 29685161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Implant Overdentures Retained by a Novel Attachment: A Mixed Methods Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.
    de Souza RF; Jabbar AA; Jafarpour D; Bedos C; Esfandiari S; Makhoul NM; Dagdeviren D; Abi Nader S; Feine JS
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2024 Jan; 9(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 36127832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial.
    Kanazawa M; Tanoue M; Miyayasu A; Takeshita S; Sato D; Asami M; Lam TV; Thu KM; Oda K; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S; Feine J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10721. PubMed ID: 29768340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of implant overdentures fabricated using 3D-printing technology versus conventional fabrication techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
    Elawady DM; Ibrahim WI; Osman RB
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 34931773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws.
    Payne AG; Alsabeeha NH; Atieh MA; Esposito M; Ma S; Anas El-Wegoud M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD008001. PubMed ID: 30308116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
    Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
    J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the single-implant mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Nogueira TE; Esfandiari S; Leles CR
    Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):533. PubMed ID: 27814749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis alongside a Randomized Trial.
    Della Vecchia MP; Leles CR; Cunha TR; Ribeiro AB; Sorgini DB; Muglia VA; Reis AC; Albuquerque RF; de Souza RF
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Jan; 3(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 30938654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of general satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, and patient's self-assessment between mandibular single-implant overdentures and experimental removable complete dentures: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
    Uehara Y; Kanazawa M; Miyayasu A; Watanabe M; Katheng A; Sato D; Minakuchi S
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103920. PubMed ID: 34906619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.
    Zygogiannis K; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 29340354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
    Emami E; Heydecke G; Rompré PH; de Grandmont P; Feine JS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 19515032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of implant-retained overdentures on type-2 diabetic and non-diabetic edentulous patients: Satisfaction and quality of life in a prospective cohort study.
    Herrero F; de Souza RF; Feine JS; Alexander PP; Green AV; Oates TW
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104357. PubMed ID: 36351489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
    Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes.
    Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Ida R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 9597609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life for four implant-assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: A crossover clinical trial.
    Gomaa AM; Mostafa AZH; El-Shaheed NH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 50(7):566-579. PubMed ID: 37002714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability.
    Geertman ME; Boerrigter EM; Van't Hof MA; Van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Boering G; Kalk W
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 24(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8833520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.