BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38629281)

  • 1. Immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients with the use of Serasynth and SeragynBR synthetic meshes. Single-oncological center experience, analysis of complications.
    Grous A; Mazur S; Winter P; Kozak K; Jagiello-Gruszfeld A; Napierała M; Nowecki Z
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Oct; 96(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 38629281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and aesthetic outcomes of SERASYNTH
    Gruber J; Schlagnitweit P; Koulaxouzidis G
    JPRAS Open; 2023 Dec; 38():82-90. PubMed ID: 37745008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Mastectomy Flap Fixation on Post-operative Fluid Drainage and Seroma Formation in Breast Cancer Patients A Double-blinded Randomised Control Trial.
    Parikshith Manjunath P; Yelamanchi R; Agrawal H; Ekta Yadav E; Gupta N; Gupta AK; Durga C
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 May; 95(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 36805309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconstructive breast surgery with partially absorbable bi-component Seragyn® BR soft mesh: an outcome analysis.
    Machleidt A; Schmidt-Feuerheerd N; Blohmer JU; Ohlinger R; Kueper J; von Waldenfels G; Dittmer S; Paepke S; Klein E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):755-761. PubMed ID: 30083777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Clavipectoral Fascia Suturing on Postmastectomy Seroma Formation.
    Mohammed M; Hamza H; Omar MI; Hussein M; Tohamy M; Farouk B; Rezk K
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Oct; 96(2):31-37. PubMed ID: 38629279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhang T; Ye J; Tian T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Mar; 48(5):925-935. PubMed ID: 37464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective analysis of treatment, including access to breast reconstructions, of breast cancer patients - war refugees from Ukraine in Poland - the experience of a single tertiary care institution.
    Wow T; Murawa D; Boguszewska-Byczkiewicz K; Burzyński J; Ryk A; Kolacinska A
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2023 Mar; 95(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 38058164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are patients most satisfied with a synthetic or a biological mesh in dual-plane immediate breast reconstruction after 5 years? A randomized controlled trial comparing the two meshes in the same patient.
    Paganini A; Meyer S; Hallberg H; Hansson E
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4133-4143. PubMed ID: 36154981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study.
    Hansson E; Edvinsson AC; Elander A; Kölby L; Hallberg H
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 123(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33051871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction.
    Pruimboom T; Schols RM; Van Kuijk SM; Van der Hulst RR; Qiu SS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD013280. PubMed ID: 32320056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Comparison Using Autologous Dermal Flap and Absorbable Breast Mesh on Patient Undergoing Subcutaneous Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Patzelt M; Zarubova L; Vecerova M; Barta J; Ouzky M; Sukop A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1145-1152. PubMed ID: 35165758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the results of using a self-adhesive mesh and a polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.
    Emral AC; Anadol AZ; Kozan R; Cetinkaya G; Altiner S; Aytac AB
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 Feb; 94(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 36468509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of demographic and perioperative risk factors on complication rates in skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction using titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra).
    Michno V; Malter W; Paepke S; Thill M; Kelling K; Meiré A; Tofall S; Nolte E; Christ H; Eichler C
    Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40():101675. PubMed ID: 34871867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative clinical outcomes of using three-dimensional and TIGR mesh in immediate breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer patients.
    Karoobi M; Yazd SMM; Nafissi N; Zolnouri M; Khosravi M; Sayad S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():321-328. PubMed ID: 37826925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermis and Polypropylene Meshes in Subpectoral Implant Placement.
    Schüler K; Paepke S; Kohlmann T; Alwafai Z; Nawroth F; Zygmunt M; Ohlinger R
    In Vivo; 2021; 35(5):2739-2746. PubMed ID: 34410963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drain secretion and seroma formation after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh, respectively: A randomized controlled study.
    Hansson E; Edvinsson AC; Hallberg H
    Breast J; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1756-1759. PubMed ID: 32515840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Inguinal Hernia Mesh (DynaMesh-ENDOLAP) in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Omranipour R; Mohammadizavieh M; Alipour S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):677-682. PubMed ID: 34590167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients With and Without Prior Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
    Fiser CK; Kronenfeld JP; Liu SN; Goel N; Kassira W; Oeltjen JC; Kesmodel SB
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 34481753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the Outcomes and Complication Rates of Biologic vs Synthetic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Makarewicz N; Perrault D; Sharma A; Shaheen M; Kim J; Calderon C; Sweeney B; Nazerali R
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):516-527. PubMed ID: 37146317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
    Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.