These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38629613)

  • 1. Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.
    Miao JJ; Luo YY; Wang CY; Li HX; Yu HX
    Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14837. PubMed ID: 38629613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.
    Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 34309465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound examination of caesarean section scars during pregnancy.
    Fukuda M; Shimizu T; Ihara Y; Fukuda K; Natsuyama E; Mochizuki M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 248(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 2018409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
    Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of physiotherapy interventions on enhancing wound healing post knee osteoarthritis surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Chu R; Chen Z; Qiu J; Pang Z; Yang H
    Int Wound J; 2024 Feb; 21(2):e14777. PubMed ID: 38361227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.
    Darwish HS; Habash YH; Habash MY
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Oct; 66():26-34. PubMed ID: 32442857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.
    Li H; Liu X; Xie L; Ye Z; Gan L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():117-122. PubMed ID: 32007793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity Of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan In The Prediction Of Uterine Scar Thickness.
    Sarwar I; Akram F; Khan A; Malik S; Islam A; Khan K
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 32468759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
    Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
    Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasonic diagnosis of scar defects following cesarean section].
    Václavinková V; Westin B
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):686-92. PubMed ID: 6385556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of onion extract in the management of subsequent abdominal hypertrophic scar formation.
    Güngör ES; Güzel D; Zebitay AG; İlhan G; Verit FF
    J Wound Care; 2020 Oct; 29(10):612-616. PubMed ID: 33052789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When a cesarean section scar is more than an innocent bystander in a subsequent pregnancy: Ultrasound to the rescue.
    Singh D; Kaur L
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jul; 45(6):319-327. PubMed ID: 28440856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?
    Singh N; Tripathi R; Mala YM; Dixit R; Tyagi S; Batra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Nov; 33(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 24219719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative wound healing in neurosurgical patients: A meta-analysis.
    Zhu C; Cao D; Chen L; Zheng X; Lin D
    Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14585. PubMed ID: 38148721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of Hypericum perforatum on the wound healing and scar of cesarean.
    Samadi S; Khadivzadeh T; Emami A; Moosavi NS; Tafaghodi M; Behnam HR
    J Altern Complement Med; 2010 Jan; 16(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 20064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.