137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38629642)
1. Tear Film Dynamics in Visual Display Terminal Users: A Review of Impact on Goblet Cells, Lacrimal and Meibomian Gland Function.
Maity M; Galor A; Basu S; Singh S
Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38629642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review on the possible pathophysiological mechanisms underlying visual display terminal-associated dry eye disease.
Fjaervoll K; Fjaervoll H; Magno M; Nøland ST; Dartt DA; Vehof J; Utheim TP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 100(8):861-877. PubMed ID: 35441459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tear film changes in symptomatic versus asymptomatic video display terminal users following computer challenge test.
Srivastav S; Basu S; Singh S
Ocul Surf; 2023 Oct; 30():53-56. PubMed ID: 37595798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lacrimal hypofunction as a new mechanism of dry eye in visual display terminal users.
Nakamura S; Kinoshita S; Yokoi N; Ogawa Y; Shibuya M; Nakashima H; Hisamura R; Imada T; Imagawa T; Uehara M; Shibuya I; Dogru M; Ward S; Tsubota K
PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e11119. PubMed ID: 20559543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Video display terminal use and dry eye: preventive measures and future perspectives.
Kamøy B; Magno M; Nøland ST; Moe MC; Petrovski G; Vehof J; Utheim TP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 100(7):723-739. PubMed ID: 35122403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of video display terminal use and meibomian gland dysfunction on the ocular surface and tear neuromediators.
Bilgic AA; Kocabeyoglu S; Dikmetas O; Tan C; Karakaya J; Irkec M
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1537-1544. PubMed ID: 36239837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of mucin levels at the ocular surface of visual display terminal users with and without dry eye disease.
Duan H; Yang T; Zhou Y; Ma B; Zhao L; Chen J; Qi H
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):189. PubMed ID: 37106448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meibomian gland dysfunction determines the severity of the dry eye conditions in visual display terminal workers.
Wu H; Wang Y; Dong N; Yang F; Lin Z; Shang X; Li C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105575. PubMed ID: 25144638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of warming eyelids on tear film stability and quality of life in visual display terminal users: a randomized controlled trial.
Sun CC; Lee CY; Hwang YS; Michihito I; Tagami K; Hsiao CH
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16919. PubMed ID: 33037255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of tear meniscus dimensions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in video terminal display workers.
Doguizi S; Sekeroglu MA; Inanc M; Yılmazbas P
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Sep; 102(5):478-484. PubMed ID: 30653712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between tear film break up time and blink interval in visual display terminal users.
Uchino M; Kawashima M; Uchino Y; Tsubota K; Yokoi N
Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(10):1691-1697. PubMed ID: 30364241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lacrimal and meibomian gland evaluation in dry eye disease: A mini-review.
Singh S; Donthineni PR; Srivastav S; Jacobi C; Basu S; Paulsen F
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 71(4):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37026239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on ocular surface and tear functions in office workers.
Kojima T; Ibrahim OM; Wakamatsu T; Tsuyama A; Ogawa J; Matsumoto Y; Dogru M; Tsubota K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 152(6):933-940.e2. PubMed ID: 21871600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association between visual display terminal use and dry eye: a review.
Fjaervoll H; Fjaervoll K; Magno M; Moschowits E; Vehof J; Dartt DA; Utheim TP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 100(4):357-375. PubMed ID: 34697901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study.
Uchino M; Yokoi N; Uchino Y; Dogru M; Kawashima M; Komuro A; Sonomura Y; Kato H; Kinoshita S; Schaumberg DA; Tsubota K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 156(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 23891330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ocular surface disease index and tear osmolarity as markers of ocular surface dysfunction in video terminal display workers.
Fenga C; Aragona P; Di Nola C; Spinella R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):41-48.e2. PubMed ID: 24631759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accumulation of secretory vesicles in the lacrimal gland epithelia is related to non-Sjögren's type dry eye in visual display terminal users.
Kamoi M; Ogawa Y; Nakamura S; Dogru M; Nagai T; Obata H; Ito M; Kaido M; Kawakita T; Okada Y; Kawakami Y; Shimmura S; Tsubota K
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43688. PubMed ID: 22962587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alteration of tear mucin 5AC in office workers using visual display terminals: The Osaka Study.
Uchino Y; Uchino M; Yokoi N; Dogru M; Kawashima M; Okada N; Inaba T; Tamaki S; Komuro A; Sonomura Y; Kato H; Argüeso P; Kinoshita S; Tsubota K
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 132(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 24903353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mean Tear-Film Lipid Layer Thickness and Video Display Terminal Time as Risk Factors for Abnormal Blinking in Children.
Zhao H; Wu SN; Cheng Z; Xiao D; Shu HY; Ge QM; Tian T; Shao Y
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():785901. PubMed ID: 34938751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of incomplete blinking on tear film stability.
Hirota M; Uozato H; Kawamorita T; Shibata Y; Yamamoto S
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 23770659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
