144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38630509)
1. A Quantitative Bias Analysis Approach to Informative Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records.
Zhang H; Clark AS; Hubbard RA
Epidemiology; 2024 May; 35(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 38630509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How and when informative visit processes can bias inference when using electronic health records data for clinical research.
Goldstein BA; Phelan M; Pagidipati NJ; Peskoe SB
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 31553474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Informative presence bias in analyses of electronic health records-derived data: a cautionary note.
Harton J; Mitra N; Hubbard RA
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Jun; 29(7):1191-1199. PubMed ID: 35438796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inflation of type I error rates due to differential misclassification in EHR-derived outcomes: Empirical illustration using breast cancer recurrence.
Chen Y; Wang J; Chubak J; Hubbard RA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30375122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing Bias Due to Outcome Misclassification for Epidemiologic Studies Using EHR-derived Probabilistic Phenotypes.
Hubbard RA; Tong J; Duan R; Chen Y
Epidemiology; 2020 Jul; 31(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 32282406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Nature of Informative Presence Bias in Analyses of Electronic Health Records.
McGee G; Haneuse S; Coull BA; Weisskopf MG; Rotem RS
Epidemiology; 2022 Jan; 33(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 34711733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the Use of Bayesian Analysis Methods Correct for Incompleteness in Electronic Health Records Diagnosis Data? Development of a Novel Method Using Simulated and Real-Life Clinical Data.
Ford E; Rooney P; Hurley P; Oliver S; Bremner S; Cassell J
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():54. PubMed ID: 32211363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PIE: A prior knowledge guided integrated likelihood estimation method for bias reduction in association studies using electronic health records data.
Huang J; Duan R; Hubbard RA; Wu Y; Moore JH; Xu H; Chen Y
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 29206922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical inference for association studies using electronic health records: handling both selection bias and outcome misclassification.
Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):214-226. PubMed ID: 33179768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-effective chart review sampling design to account for phenotyping error in electronic health records (EHR) data.
Yin Z; Tong J; Chen Y; Hubbard RA; Tang CY
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Dec; 29(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 34718618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case studies in bias reduction and inference for electronic health record data with selection bias and phenotype misclassification.
Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(28):5501-5516. PubMed ID: 36131394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data Quality in Electronic Health Record Research: An Approach for Validation and Quantitative Bias Analysis for Imperfectly Ascertained Health Outcomes Via Diagnostic Codes.
Goldstein ND; Kahal D; Testa K; Gracely EJ; Burstyn I
Harv Data Sci Rev; 2022; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 36324333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A primer on quantitative bias analysis with positive predictive values in research using electronic health data.
Newcomer SR; Xu S; Kulldorff M; Daley MF; Fireman B; Glanz JM
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1664-1674. PubMed ID: 31365086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An augmented estimation procedure for EHR-based association studies accounting for differential misclassification.
Tong J; Huang J; Chubak J; Wang X; Moore JH; Hubbard RA; Chen Y
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Feb; 27(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 31617899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adult patient access to electronic health records.
Ammenwerth E; Neyer S; Hörbst A; Mueller G; Siebert U; Schnell-Inderst P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD012707. PubMed ID: 33634854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of longitudinal data-completeness of electronic health record data on risk score misclassification.
Jin Y; Schneeweiss S; Merola D; Lin KJ
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Jun; 29(7):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 35357470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.
Lin KJ; Singer DE; Glynn RJ; Murphy SN; Lii J; Schneeweiss S
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2018 May; 103(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 28865143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal Data Discontinuity in Electronic Health Records and Consequences for Medication Effectiveness Studies.
Joshua Lin K; Jin Y; Gagne J; Glynn RJ; Murphy SN; Tong A; Schneeweiss S
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2022 Jan; 111(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 34424534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weakly Semi-supervised phenotyping using Electronic Health records.
Nogues IE; Wen J; Lin Y; Liu M; Tedeschi SK; Geva A; Cai T; Hong C
J Biomed Inform; 2022 Oct; 134():104175. PubMed ID: 36064111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
