BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38631437)

  • 1. Incorporating functional genomics into the pathology-supported genetic testing framework implemented in South Africa: A future view of precision medicine for breast carcinomas.
    Christowitz C; Olivier DW; Schneider JW; Kotze MJ; Engelbrecht AM
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2024; 793():108492. PubMed ID: 38631437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of advanced molecular technology in the diagnosis and management of genetic disorders in South Africa.
    Kotze M
    S Afr Med J; 2016 May; 106(6 Suppl 1):S114-8. PubMed ID: 27245544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic medicine and risk prediction across the disease spectrum.
    Kotze MJ; Lückhoff HK; Peeters AV; Baatjes K; Schoeman M; van der Merwe L; Grant KA; Fisher LR; van der Merwe N; Pretorius J; van Velden DP; Myburgh EJ; Pienaar FM; van Rensburg SJ; Yako YY; September AV; Moremi KE; Cronje FJ; Tiffin N; Bouwens CS; Bezuidenhout J; Apffelstaedt JP; Hough FS; Erasmus RT; Schneider JW
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2015; 52(3):120-37. PubMed ID: 25597499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Findings from precision oncology in the clinic: rare, novel variants are a significant contributor to scaling molecular diagnostics.
    Doig KD; Love CG; Conway T; Seleznev A; Ma D; Fellowes A; Blombery P; Fox SB
    BMC Med Genomics; 2022 Mar; 15(1):70. PubMed ID: 35346197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.
    Hu C; Susswein LR; Roberts ME; Yang H; Marshall ML; Hiraki S; Berkofsky-Fessler W; Gupta S; Shen W; Dunn CA; Huang H; Na J; Domchek SM; Yadav S; Monteiro ANA; Polley EC; Hart SN; Hruska KS; Couch FJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2022 Sep; 28(17):3742-3751. PubMed ID: 35736817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks.
    Brnich SE; Rivera-Muñoz EA; Berg JS
    Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 30095857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exome Sequencing in a Family with Luminal-Type Breast Cancer Underpinned by Variation in the Methylation Pathway.
    van der Merwe N; Peeters AV; Pienaar FM; Bezuidenhout J; van Rensburg SJ; Kotze MJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 28241424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will variants of uncertain significance still exist in 2030?
    Fowler DM; Rehm HL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jan; 111(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 38086381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-Throughput Assays to Assess the Functional Impact of Genetic Variants: A Road Towards Genomic-Driven Medicine.
    Ipe J; Swart M; Burgess KS; Skaar TC
    Clin Transl Sci; 2017 Mar; 10(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 28213901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical implications of VUS reclassification in a single-centre series from application of ACMG/AMP classification rules specified for
    Innella G; Ferrari S; Miccoli S; Luppi E; Fortuno C; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Turchetti D
    J Med Genet; 2024 Apr; 61(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 38160042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenges in periodic revision of genetic testing results: Comparison of the main classification guidelines and report of a retrospective analysis involving BRCA1/BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.
    Andreis TF; de Souza KIW; Vieira IA; Alemar B; Sinigaglia M; de Araújo Rocha YM; Artigalás O; Bittar C; Oliveira Netto CB; Ashton-Prolla P; Rosset C
    Gene; 2023 Apr; 862():147281. PubMed ID: 36775216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and Technical Aspects of Genomic Diagnostics for Precision Oncology.
    Sheikine Y; Kuo FC; Lindeman NI
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Mar; 35(9):929-933. PubMed ID: 28297627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.
    So MK; Jeong TD; Lim W; Moon BI; Paik NS; Kim SC; Huh J
    Breast Cancer; 2019 Jul; 26(4):510-519. PubMed ID: 30725392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A machine learning approach based on ACMG/AMP guidelines for genomic variant classification and prioritization.
    Nicora G; Zucca S; Limongelli I; Bellazzi R; Magni P
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2517. PubMed ID: 35169226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reclassification of
    Lee JS; Oh S; Park SK; Lee MH; Lee JW; Kim SW; Son BH; Noh DY; Lee JE; Park HL; Kim MJ; Cho SI; Lee YK; Park SS; Seong MW
    J Med Genet; 2018 Dec; 55(12):794-802. PubMed ID: 30415210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of functional assay data results provides strong evidence for classification of hundreds of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.
    Lyra PCM; Nepomuceno TC; de Souza MLM; Machado GF; Veloso MF; Henriques TB; Dos Santos DZ; Ribeiro IG; Ribeiro RS; Rangel LBA; Richardson M; Iversen ES; Goldgar D; Couch FJ; Carvalho MA; Monteiro ANA
    Genet Med; 2021 Feb; 23(2):306-315. PubMed ID: 33087888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.
    Kim HK; Lee EJ; Lee YJ; Kim J; Kim Y; Kim K; Lee SW; Chang S; Lee YJ; Lee JW; Lee W; Chun S; Son BH; Jung KH; Kim YM; Min WK; Ahn SH
    J Hum Genet; 2020 Mar; 65(3):209-220. PubMed ID: 31907386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variant Interpretation for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Refinement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/ClinGen Guidelines for the DCM Precision Medicine Study.
    Morales A; Kinnamon DD; Jordan E; Platt J; Vatta M; Dorschner MO; Starkey CA; Mead JO; Ai T; Burke W; Gastier-Foster J; Jarvik GP; Rehm HL; Nickerson DA; Hershberger RE; ;
    Circ Genom Precis Med; 2020 Apr; 13(2):e002480. PubMed ID: 32160020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of 92 patient-driven family studies for reclassification of variants of uncertain significance.
    Tsai GJ; Rañola JMO; Smith C; Garrett LT; Bergquist T; Casadei S; Bowen DJ; Shirts BH
    Genet Med; 2019 Jun; 21(6):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 30374176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variants of uncertain significance in the era of high-throughput genome sequencing: a lesson from breast and ovary cancers.
    Federici G; Soddu S
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2020 Mar; 39(1):46. PubMed ID: 32127026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.