These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Coherence enhancement in quantitative susceptibility mapping by means of anisotropic weighting in morphology enabled dipole inversion. Kee Y; Cho J; Deh K; Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 28556244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The 2016 QSM Challenge: Lessons learned and considerations for a future challenge design. Milovic C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J; Ă–zbay PS; Schwesser F; Marques JP; Irarrazaval P; Bilgic B; Langkammer C Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1624-1637. PubMed ID: 32086836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method. Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigating the accuracy and precision of TE-dependent versus multi-echo QSM using Laplacian-based methods at 3 T. Biondetti E; Karsa A; Thomas DL; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 32491224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Learn Less, Infer More: Learning in the Fourier Domain for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. He J; Wang L; Cao Y; Wang R; Zhu Y Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():837721. PubMed ID: 35250469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping. Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Primal-dual and forward gradient implementation for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Kee Y; Deh K; Dimov A; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2017 Dec; 78(6):2416-2427. PubMed ID: 28251685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Streaking artifact suppression of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstructions via L1-norm data fidelity optimization (L1-QSM). Milovic C; Lambert M; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Irarrazaval P; Tejos C Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):457-473. PubMed ID: 34350634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative magnetic susceptibility mapping without phase unwrapping using WASSR. Lim IA; Li X; Jones CK; Farrell JA; Vikram DS; van Zijl PC Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():265-79. PubMed ID: 24113625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge. Langkammer C; Schweser F; Shmueli K; Kames C; Li X; Guo L; Milovic C; Kim J; Wei H; Bredies K; Buch S; Guo Y; Liu Z; Meineke J; Rauscher A; Marques JP; Bilgic B Magn Reson Med; 2018 Mar; 79(3):1661-1673. PubMed ID: 28762243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method. Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping. Karsa A; Punwani S; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1833-1848. PubMed ID: 30338864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Li W; Wang N; Yu F; Han H; Cao W; Romero R; Tantiwongkosi B; Duong TQ; Liu C Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():111-22. PubMed ID: 25536496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]