These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38631929)

  • 1. Reliability of Bioreactance and Pulse-Power Analysis in Measuring Cardiac Index During Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery.
    Ronkainen HPO; Ylikauma LA; Pohjola MJ; Ohtonen PP; Erkinaro TM; Vakkala MA; Liisanantti JH; Juvonen TS; Kaakinen TI
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 38631929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of Bioreactance and Pulse-Power Analysis in Measuring Cardiac Index in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
    Ylikauma LA; Lanning KM; Erkinaro TM; Ohtonen PP; Vakkala MA; Liisanantti JH; Juvonen TS; Kaakinen TI
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(8 Pt A):2446-2453. PubMed ID: 35027295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioreactance and fourth-generation pulse contour methods in monitoring cardiac index during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Ylikauma LA; Ohtonen PP; Erkinaro TM; Vakkala MA; Liisanantti JH; Satta JU; Juvonen TS; Kaakinen TI
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Jun; 36(3):879-888. PubMed ID: 34037919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of bioreactance and pulse power analysis in measuring cardiac index during cytoreductive abdominal surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
    Ylikauma LA; Tuovila MJ; Ohtonen PP; Erkinaro TM; Vakkala MA; Takala HT; Liisanantti JH; Kaakinen TI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):38. PubMed ID: 36721097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac Output Measurements Based on the Pulse Wave Transit Time and Thoracic Impedance Exhibit Limited Agreement With Thermodilution Method During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
    Magliocca A; Rezoagli E; Anderson TA; Burns SM; Ichinose F; Chitilian HV
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28598912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective observational study.
    Montenij LJ; Buhre WF; de Jong SA; Harms JH; van Herwaarden JA; Kruitwagen CL; de Waal EE
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
    Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
    Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.
    Lee M; Weinberg L; Pearce B; Scurrah N; Story DA; Pillai P; McCall PR; P McNicol L; Peyton PJ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):343-351. PubMed ID: 26884378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Kusaka Y; Ohchi F; Minami T
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Apr; 33(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 30077561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass: Comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing.
    Botero M; Kirby D; Lobato EB; Staples ED; Gravenstein N
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2004 Oct; 18(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 15578466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Cardiac Output Measurements Using LiDCOrapid and Calibration by Transesophageal Echocardiography With the Continuous Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.
    Sato M; Kunisawa T
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Dec; 32(6):2495-2502. PubMed ID: 29801725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery--a prospective observational study.
    Chakravarthy M; Patil TA; Jayaprakash K; Kalligudd P; Prabhakumar D; Jawali V
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2007 Jul; 10(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 17644884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Buhre W; Weyland A; Kazmaier S; Hanekop GG; Baryalei MM; Sydow M; Sonntag H
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1999 Aug; 13(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 10468257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive assessment of Cardiac Index using impedance cardiography during liver transplantation surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Suparschi V; Le Bihan E; Toussaint A; Saptefrat D; Ben Abdallah H; Gloulou F; Aouati F; Gauss T; Paugam-Burtz C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Jan; 85(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29745622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical validation of pulse contour and pulse wave transit time-based continuous cardiac output analyses in Thai patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Wacharasint P; Kunakorn P; Pankongsap P; Preechanukul R
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Jan; 97 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 24855843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in euvolemic adult horses subjected with 7.2% saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution infusions.
    Long AE; Hurcombe S; Hopster K
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2024; 34(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 39256943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.