These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38632149)

  • 1. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors.
    Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commission errors with forced response lag.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2380-2392. PubMed ID: 30862247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failing to forget: prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):965-71. PubMed ID: 22799284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; Rauvola RS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 27064599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Commission Errors under Different Cognitive Loads.
    Guo Y; Gan J; Ding Y; Li Y
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37504049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commission errors of active intentions: the roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice.
    Boywitt CD; Rummel J; Meiser T
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(5):560-76. PubMed ID: 25599267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A thorough examination of cue specificity and task-appropriateness in defining focal and nonfocal prospective memory tasks.
    Lyon BA; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2023 May; 31(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 36945870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.
    Kurtz M; Scherbaum S; Walser M; Kanske P; Möschl M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1590-1613. PubMed ID: 35212979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
    Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of age, ongoing task difficulty, and cue salience on preschoolers' prospective memory performance: the role of executive function.
    Mahy CE; Moses LJ; Kliegel M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():52-64. PubMed ID: 24613075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM; McDaniel MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 22082015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.