52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38632478)
1. Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients.
Tucker N; Chow D; Stockl F; Codère F; Burnier M
Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1882-6. PubMed ID: 9373121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical characteristics and cytological changes in mucinous obstruction diagnosed by dacryoendoscopy.
Kim D; Lew H
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8891. PubMed ID: 38632478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcanalicular endoscopic dacryoplasty in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Lee SM; Lew H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 259(1):173-180. PubMed ID: 32743774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The technique and its role of dacryoendoscopy in the management of the false passage of the lacrimal drainage system.
Kim M; Lew H
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22493. PubMed ID: 36577895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term Efficacy of Dacryoendoscopy-guided Recanalization and Silicone Tube Intubation.
Kim SE; Beak JU; Paik JS; Park J; Yang SW
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):185-193. PubMed ID: 35067021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Etiopathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO).
Ali MJ
Prog Retin Eye Res; 2023 Sep; 96():101193. PubMed ID: 37394093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy.
Nakamura J; Kamao T; Mitani A; Mizuki N; Shiraishi A
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1277-1285. PubMed ID: 37162802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dacryoendoscopic Findings in the Failed Silicone Tube Intubations without Dacryoendoscopy.
Kim DA; Lew H
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 36(6):486-492. PubMed ID: 36220637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional Versus Anatomical Nasolacrimal Obstruction: Are There Differences in Epiphora Severity, Symptoms, or Effects on Quality of Life?
Shapira Y; Macri C; Selva D
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 38(6):567-570. PubMed ID: 35502798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-based thin-prep cytology study of lacrimal drainage system in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Jang JK; Choi SE; Lew H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3053-3059. PubMed ID: 35471740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay.
Shapira Y; Juniat V; Macri C; Selva D
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3037-3042. PubMed ID: 35460361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metagenomics of infective canaliculitis: The Lacriome paper 3.
Ali MJ
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3346-3352. PubMed ID: 35354326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
