These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38633318)

  • 1. Carcass assessment and value in the Australian beef and sheepmeat industry.
    Stewart SM; Polkinghorne R; Pethick DW; Pannier L
    Anim Front; 2024 Apr; 14(2):5-14. PubMed ID: 38633318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting lamb eating quality and the potential for their integration into an MSA sheepmeat grading model.
    Pannier L; Gardner GE; O'Reilly RA; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2018 Oct; 144():43-52. PubMed ID: 30008337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Mixed Method Approach for the Investigation of Consumer Responses to Sheepmeat and Beef.
    Hastie M; Ashman H; Torrico D; Ha M; Warner R
    Foods; 2020 Jan; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31991694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
    Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
    Liu J; Pogorzelski G; Neveu A; Legrand I; Pethick D; Ellies-Oury MP; Hocquette JF
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():611153. PubMed ID: 33855054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beef production from cull dairy cows: a review from culling to consumption.
    Moreira LC; Rosa GJM; Schaefer DM
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 99(7):. PubMed ID: 34125214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Survey of instrument grading assessments of beef carcass characteristics.
    Gray GD; Moore MC; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Lawrence TE; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Delmore RJ; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5152-8. PubMed ID: 22952354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system.
    Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 12597385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of beef carcass salable yield and trimmable fat using bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    Zollinger BL; Farrow RL; Lawrence TE; Latman NS
    Meat Sci; 2010 Mar; 84(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 20374809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of meat quality properties and development of a palatability prediction model for Korean Hanwoo steer beef.
    Cho SH; Kim J; Park BY; Seong PN; Kang GH; Kim JH; Jung SG; Im SK; Kim DH
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):236-42. PubMed ID: 20584575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
    Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Beef Quality Audit - 2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):3003-3011. PubMed ID: 28727107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Live animal predictions of carcass components and marble score in beef cattle: model development and evaluation.
    McPhee MJ; Walmsley BJ; Dougherty HC; McKiernan WA; Oddy VH
    Animal; 2020 Aug; 14(S2):s396-s405. PubMed ID: 32172725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of beef carcass quality and quantity attributes in Mexico.
    Méndez RD; Meza CO; Berruecos JM; Garcés P; Delgado EJ; Rubio MS
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3782-90. PubMed ID: 19648507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicted carcass meat yield and primal cut yields in cattle divergent in genetic merit for a terminal index.
    Connolly SM; Cromie AR; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    Transl Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 32704772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture.
    Cannell RC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 12019606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sire Effects on Carcass of Beef-Cross-Dairy Cattle: A Case Study in New Zealand.
    Martín N; Schreurs N; Morris S; López-Villalobos N; McDade J; Hickson R
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33673584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meat standards and grading: a world view.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Thompson JM
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 20541325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lean meat yield estimation using a prototype 3D imaging approach.
    Alempijevic A; Vidal-Calleja T; Falque R; Quin P; Toohey E; Walmsley B; McPhee M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108470. PubMed ID: 33642037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.