These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3863483)

  • 21. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semiparametric linkage analysis using pseudolikelihoods on neighbouring sets.
    Li H; Huang J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):323-36. PubMed ID: 9924610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multilocus quantitative trait analysis using the multipoint identity-by-descent method.
    Lewis CM; Kort EN
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):839-44. PubMed ID: 9433587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power and robustness of a score test for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using identity by descent data on sib pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):415-31. PubMed ID: 11319783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Matrix representation of the Haseman-Elston method.
    Drigalenko E
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 10329515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the total expected study cost in two-stage genome-wide search designs for linkage analysis using the mean test for affected sib pairs.
    Ziegler A; Böddeker I; Geller F; Müller HH; Guo X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 11255247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical validity of the Haseman-Elston sib-pair test in small samples.
    Wilson AF; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 8314066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conditional likelihood score functions for mixed models in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):313-32. PubMed ID: 15772109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficient use of siblings in testing for linkage and association.
    Rieger RH; Kaplan NL; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11180445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An oliogenic disease displaying weak marker associations: a summary of contributions to problem 1 of GAW9.
    Hodge SE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 8787971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. HLA sharing in multiplex sibships.
    Suarez BK; Crouse J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Ann Hum Genet; 1983 May; 47(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 6881912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sib-pair linkage analyses of nuclear family data: quantitative versus dichotomous disease classification.
    Korczak JF; Goldstein AM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 9433585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identity-by-descent analysis of sibship configurations when parental haplotypes can be distinguished.
    Shute NC
    Am J Med Genet; 1988 Feb; 29(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 3354614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Covariate effects on linkage and association using a general pair method.
    Ward PJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1059-64. PubMed ID: 9433624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Linkage analysis in non-Mendelian disorders.
    Easton DF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():159-64. PubMed ID: 2622946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A generalized estimating equations approach to linkage analysis in sibships in relation to multiple markers and exposure factors.
    Thomas DC; Qian D; Gauderman WJ; Siegmund K; Morrison JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S737-42. PubMed ID: 10597523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of segregation and ascertainment probabilities by discarding the single probands.
    Li CC; Chakravarti A; Halloran SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 3609718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.