BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3863490)

  • 1. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.
    Bell R; Kiyak HA; Joondeph DR; McNeill RW; Wallen TR
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 3863490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of orthognathic surgery patient's change in profile. A five-year follow-up.
    Montini RW; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17029539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentofacial appearance: a comparison of patient self-assessment techniques.
    Maxwell R; Kiyak HA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 1811031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery.
    Burcal RG; Laskin DM; Sperry TP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Aug; 45(8):666-70. PubMed ID: 3475437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients.
    Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presurgical satisfaction with facial appearance in orthognathic surgery patients.
    van Steenbergen E; Litt MD; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):653-9. PubMed ID: 8659476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    Juggins KJ; Nixon F; Cunningham SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 16360908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.
    Klaus K; Heumann C; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 28660422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists and laypersons in relation to the harmony of the smile.
    Lauria A; Rodrigues DC; de Medeiros RC; Moreira RW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1664-8. PubMed ID: 24969767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
    Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.