These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3863490)

  • 41. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
    Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery.
    Kiyak HA; Zeitler DL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 May; 46(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 3163369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Occlusal plane alteration in orthognathic surgery--Part I: Effects on function and esthetics.
    Wolford LM; Chemello PD; Hilliard F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):304-16. PubMed ID: 8074096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 21846874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of dental and skeletal movements on the facial profile within the framework of orthodontic and surgical treatments.
    Teitelbaum V; Balon-Perin A; De Maertelaer V; Daelemans P; Glineur R
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 12099320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perception of profile among laypeople, dental students and orthodontic patients.
    Tufekci E; Jahangiri A; Lindauer SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):983-7. PubMed ID: 18947285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patients' own reasons and patient-perceived recommendations for orthognathic surgery.
    Rivera SM; Hatch JP; Dolce C; Bays RA; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 10935952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceived changes by peer group of social impact associated with combined orthodontic-surgical correction of class III malocclusion.
    Jesani A; DiBiase AT; Cobourne MT; Newton T
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 24874952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Orthodontic-surgical cooperation in the treatment of maxillomandibular deformities].
    Richter M; Mossaz C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Jul; 99 Suppl 1():6-16. PubMed ID: 9697230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An index for objective evaluation of the soft tissue profile.
    Abe Y; Haebara T; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 2135602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The relationship between the surgeon and the orthodontist in orthognathic surgery.
    McCarthy JG; Grayson B; Zide B
    Clin Plast Surg; 1982 Oct; 9(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 7172593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ravindranath S; Krishnaswamy NR; Sundaram V
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 22299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Satisfaction with orthognathic surgery of skeletal Class III patients.
    Asada K; Motoyoshi M; Tamura T; Nakajima A; Mayahara K; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):827-37. PubMed ID: 26522044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Level of agreement in clinicians' perceptions of Class II malocclusions.
    Phillips C; Bailey LJ; Sieber RP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Jun; 52(6):565-71; discussion 572-3. PubMed ID: 8189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.